Publication, Part of Archive of General Practice Workforce publications
General Practice Workforce 31 March 2021
Publication archived
As part of the 31 December 2021 publication, released on 10 February 2022, we introduced a significant methodological change and recalculated and re-published all historical figures back to September 2015, which means that figures in that release differ from and supersede those previously published, including those in this publication.
These pages have been retained in the publication archive for your reference, but the figures presented should no longer be used.
See the Methodological Review and Changes page of the December 2021 publication for an explanation of the changes.
10 February 2022 09:30 AM
Data Quality - March 2021
This release of the General Practice Workforce Official Statistics has been affected by several significant events which have had – or will have – an effect upon the figures.
Data Completeness
We collect information about the general practice workforce directly from practices using the National Workforce Reporting System (NWRS). We ask practices to ensure that the information about their staff is kept up-to-date and NWRS automatically extracts the data. There is evidence to suggest that the completeness and coverage of data extracted from the NWRS for March and June 2020 were adversely affected by a range of issues, including the COVID-19 pandemic, and that the exceptional pressures on the general practice workforce meant not all practices were able to update their NWRS data in time for the extracts on 31 March and 30 June.
From September 2020, we are confident practices returned to normal levels of NWRS data completion in time for the quarterly extracts.
'Infrequent ' or 'ad-hoc' locums
This series is primarily a snapshot of the general practice workforce at the time of data extract. The only group for which this is not the case is an element of the GP locum workforce which one might describe as 'infrequent' or 'ad-hoc' locums.
Some practices employ locum GPs on a long-term or regular basis, for example to provide cover for maternity leave or for one or more recurring weekly or monthly sessions. In these cases, the locum’s details are recorded in the main part of the NWRS together with records for permanent practice staff and, like other staff roles, information about them is a snapshot.
However, some locum provision is needed on a more ad-hoc basis, for example to cover one or more sessions at short notice. In such circumstances, practices enter summary details of the locum GP along with the total number of hours worked during the entire reporting period. This means that this 'infrequent' locum element of the workforce is captured and measured differently to all other staff roles. The headcount and FTE of 'infrequent' locums is not a snapshot, but a reflection of their usage - total headcount and average weekly FTE - throughout the reporting period. The 'infrequent' locum FTE is therefore a calculated measure that is indicative of usage and activity of the cohort.
'Regular' and 'ad-hoc' locum figures have previously been combined into a single GP Locum job role in this publication except in the open data CSVs, but from this release they have been separated in all tables and files, including for historical figures within the time series tables.
Primary Care Networks (PCNs)
Since July 2019, all GP practices in England have had the opportunity to join one of around 1,250 Primary Care Network and the vast majority have taken the opportunity to do so. PCN member organisations, which include GP practices, and other health, social care, mental health, and voluntary sector providers, will deliver accessible and integrated care to local communities.
These PCNs have their own distinct direct patient care workforces and data relating to these staff was collected for the first time on 31 March 2020. There is a helpful overview of PCNs and a new series of experimental statistics.
It is possible that some individuals previously working in a GP practice may transfer some or all of their working hours to their new PCNs. In particular:
- All PCNs are required to have a suitably qualified accountable person to act as the clinical director. This post is usually filled by a GP, nurse, or another direct care professional and typically requires a commitment of 0.25 FTE. It is therefore possible that FTE counts of staff in these job roles will decrease in the general practice workforce statistics as some of their working hours are transferred to the PCNs.
PCNs employ GPs or nurses only in the capacity of clinical directors - they do not employ GPs or nurses to deliver patient care.
- Some clinical pharmacists and pharmacy technicians formerly working in general practice will transfer some or all of their working hours to their local PCN which will reduce the FTE and headcount figures in the General Practice Workforce statistics for staff in these roles.
- There may also be decreases in the FTE counts for some other roles such as administrative staff and other direct patient care professionals if they begin to work full or part-time for the PCN.
We are working closely with data providers to ensure that the reported hours of staff working on both general practices and PCNs are recorded correctly to prevent double counting.
We have included information about each GP practice’s PCN in the practice level CSV file. When considering these general practice statistics by PCN, please take note of the following points:
- Aggregating from GP practice to PCN to CCG will not replicate the CCG figures
This is because we estimate for missing records at CCG level but not at a lower level meaning the CCG totals would be higher than the sum of the PCN figures.
- Because membership of a PCN is not mandatory, some practices have chosen not to join a PCN and information about their workforces will not be included in any PCN totals.
- While PCN boundaries are generally expected to align with CCG boundaries there are some exceptions, notably where effective and successful cross-CCG collaborative working was already in place. In this instance, a responsible CCG is identified for PCN-data reporting purposes even if some GP practice members belong to a different CCG.
- The PCN structure is not static and some PCNs have already closed, merged, or recently opened. Similarly, some GP practices have changed their PCN membership – a few have done so several times – since the PCNs were first formed in July 2019, and some GP practices that were originally PCN members have left the local PCN but not joined another.
- We have no plans to retrospectively re-map PCN membership in the practice-level CSVs as practice membership changes.
Information about PCNs, the GP practice members and the relationships to CCGs are available from the Organisation Data Service (ODS) which receives monthly updates about PCNs and their member organisations.
This publication includes a standalone table of counts of PCN Clinical Directors. We began collecting information on PCN Clinical Directors during 2019 when the PCNs were first set up, and before the PCN module of NWRS was available.
The role of Clinical Director is only available for use in PCNs and we have asked practices to transfer details of all staff holding PCN roles - including Clinical Directors - to the PCN module in the NWRS collection. Therefore, these Clinical Directors do not constitute part of the General Practice workforce which is why they are being reported separately.
We anticipate that all practices will transfer Clinical Directors to the applicable PCNs over the next few months and that this standalone table will be withdrawn.
Last edited: 4 July 2022 4:03 pm