Maternity Services Monthly Statistics, Final January 2025, Provisional February 2025, official statistics

Caution should be used when interpreting the maternity care activity figures included in this publication for the following trusts that reported fewer births and deliveries than expected in their January 2025 MSDS submission:

• The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust (RQW) 
• South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust (R0B) 
• Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (RN5) 
• Isle of Wight NHS Trust (R1F) 
• The Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (RAS) 
• Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (RAL)  (following the merger with North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust (RAP) on 1 January 2025)

Caution should also be used when interpreting the maternity care activity figures included in this publication for East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust (RWH) as this trust reported more bookings than expected in their January 2025 MSDS submission.

Following the merger of Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (RAL) and North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust (RAP) on 1 January 2025,  measures in the January 2025 final and February 2025 provisional data for Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (RAL) that use MSDS data from multiple months may show that data quality checks were not passed. This is due to the way in which the checks for these measures are calculated following a merger, and is expected to resolve over the next month or two.

Site of booking contains a high proportion of GP practice codes in addition to hospital site codes. This is because the initial antenatal booking often takes place in non-hospital settings, such as the patient's home or GP practice.

This page aims to provide users with an evidence-based assessment of the quality of the statistical output of the Maternity Services Monthly Statistics publication by reporting against those of the nine European Statistical System (ESS) quality dimensions and principles appropriate to this output.

In doing so, this meets our obligation to comply with the UK Statistics Authority (UKSA) Code of Practice for Official Statistics, particularly Principle Q3, which states:

“Producers of statistics and data should explain clearly how they assure themselves that statistics and data are accurate, reliable, coherent and timely”.

For each dimension this page describes how this applies to the publication and references any measures in the accompanying monthly data quality measures report that are relevant for assessing the quality of the output.

These statistics are now classified as official. More information about official statistics can be found on the UK Statistics Authority website.

The degree to which the statistical product meets user needs in both coverage and content.

This publication comprises a set of reports which have been produced from NHS-funded maternity service providers’ monthly MSDS submissions. It provides the timeliest information from the MSDS.

The MSDS does not cover non-NHS funded maternity services provided by independent organisations (e.g. private clinics).

The MSDS has been developed to help achieve better outcomes of care for mothers, babies and children. Monthly outputs from the MSDS include:

• An HTML executive summary
• Two CSV files, CSV Data and Measures, containing the aggregate underlying data for final month data, and two for provisional month data.
• A CSV Data Quality file showing national and provider-level data quality measures for final month data, and one for provisional month data.
• A detailed Metadata file describing all of the measures in the analysis. This includes, for each measure, how it has been constructed from providers’ submissions and how and where it is used.

Accuracy is the proximity between an estimate and the unknown true value.

Reliability is the closeness of early estimates to subsequent estimated values.

Accuracy

The MSDS is a rich, person level data set that records packages of care received by individuals in contact with NHS-funded maternity services. NHS England provides a number of different reports at different stages in the data flow to ensure that the submitted data reflects the services that have been provided:

For data suppliers only:

At the point of submission:

• Providers receive immediate feedback on the quality of their submission through a validation file. This file includes record-level reports of any submission errors, giving the data providers detailed information about which records produced which errors.

On receipt of processed data by NHS England:

• A variety of data quality checks are run as part of the validation and load process for monthly data, prior to production of this monthly release. Where there are concerns about data quality we contact providers directly so that any issues with local data extraction processes can be addressed for a future submission.

For all users:

As part of this publication, we publish a CSV file of data quality of submissions from maternity service providers.

Users of the data must make their own assessment of the quality of the data for a particular purpose, drawing on these resources.

In addition, local knowledge, or other comparative data sources, may be required to distinguish changes in volume between reporting periods that reflect changes in service delivery from those that are an artefact of changes in data quality.

The analysis in this report is based on the latest data submitted by providers during the two month window to provide data. Any data which are re-submitted by a provider during the submission window will be used in place of an earlier submission within the window. We invite and welcome feedback from users on our constructions.

Reliability

Coverage – are all eligible providers submitting data?

All providers of NHS-funded maternity services should submit MSDS data. However, at present not all providers are making full submissions. 

All trusts made a submission, however some trusts submitted a limited number of tables. Detailed information on submission completeness can be found in the accompanying data quality file.

This publication reports on activity that was submitted for the January 2025 reporting period.  As a revised national level data set there have been a number of issues in terms of non-response from providers which in turn has an impact on the geographical coverage expected of the data set, hence some caution should be taken when interpreting the data at levels higher than individual provider level.

Because of this, no figures derived from the MSDS data have been presented as England total figures, rather they are presented in terms of all providers who submitted data to the MSDS for the reporting period in question. While the number of submitting providers is all we expect, the number of providers submitting valid data for each data table and data item varies widely. Totals therefore continue to be presented as 'all submitters' values, and users of the data should consider the coverage for the relevant analysis when interpreting the data.

Coverage – is data for all eligible people included in the submission?

Local knowledge may be required to assess the completeness of a submission, based on information about local caseload. This publication provides detailed information about activity and providers and commissioners are encouraged to review this to ensure that submissions accurately reflect the local situation. Providers should also use all the aggregate record counts produced at the point of submission as part of the Data Summary Reports to check coverage in key areas (e.g. number of booking appointments.)

Where an organisation is submitting delivery data to MSDS, the number of deliveries reported in a month can be compared to the 2023-24 monthly average number of deliveries in HES to review the levels of activity reported in the MSDS for each organisation (noting that MSDS is not limited to births in hospital). Where an organisation has not submitted delivery data to MSDS, a similar comparison can be made using the number of booking appointments in the month, bearing in mind that not all booking appointments will lead to a birth for that pregnancy within a reporting organisation. 

Duplication

Validations are in place to ensure that there is only one booking appointment for each woman submitted to NHS England per organisation for the particular reporting period. It is possible that one woman may have multiple booking appointments recorded for the same pregnancy for different providers. For any calculated total value presented in this report a woman is only counted once in relation to the activity related to the booking appointment. For example, if a woman is reported for a booking appointment by two separate organisations within the same NHS England Region then they would be counted in any total for each of these providers presented at the provider level but would only be counted once for the overall NHS England Region. However, if the woman was reported by two separate providers within two separate NHS England Regions then they would be counted in the overall total calculated for each NHS England Region.

If a woman is reported for a booking appointment by two separate organisations within the same NHS England Region and different data are submitted by each provider then this woman may be counted twice for the overall NHS England Region total. For example, where a woman has an age recorded as 39 by one provider and 40 by another provider this woman would be counted in the NHS England Region total twice, once in the '35 to 39' age group and once in the '40 to 44' age group.

Similarly, a baby reported by two separate organisations within the same NHS England Region with an Apgar score at 5 minutes of 6 recorded by one provider and 8 by another provider would be counted in the NHS England Region total twice, once in the '0 to 6' group and once in the '7 to 10' group.

Timeliness of recording events on local systems

Whilst local systems may be continuously updated, the MSDS submission process provides a time-limited opportunity for data relevant to each month to be submitted. The submission window opens the day after the reporting month and remains open for two months. This means that the timeliness of recording all relevant activity on local systems has an impact on the completeness of the MSDS submission. For example, a booking appointment made in April 2023, but not entered onto the local system until July 2023, will not have been included in the April 2023 submission (deadline end of June 2023). Providers should use the data summary reports produced at the point of submission to ensure that all relevant data has been included.

In May 2023 we moved from processing data submissions at only one point at the end of the two-month reporting window, to processing the data submissions at two points: mid-way through and at the end of the two-month reporting window. This means that submissions made in the first month of the reporting window will now be processed as the provisional submission of the respective reporting period and will produce provisional statistics. We will continue to run final processing on submissions at the end of the second month for final national analysis and reporting purposes. For example, a booking appointment made in April 2023 and included in the MSDS submission of April activity before the end of May 2023 will be included in the provisional April 2023 published figures, but if it was not included in the MSDS submission of April activity until sometime during June 2023 then it would only be included in the later final April 2023 published figures.

The submission requirements for MSDS are that all appropriate activity (e.g. booking appointment, dating scans, etc.) be included in the submission for each month in which they start, continue or end. It is important that data providers ensure that NHS numbers are submitted consistently because this is a key piece of information for creating the person identifiers in our records.

Quality of analysis

These statistics meet the standards set out for Official Statistics. The measures are well established and consistently produced using high quality data representative of maternity services in England. We shall review whether any existing and new measures need to be specifically labelled as Official Statistics in development, where the data quality or completeness is yet to be sufficiently improved.

Reference should be made to all accompanying footnotes and commentary when using these statistics.

Timeliness refers to the time gap between publication and the reference period. Punctuality refers to the gap between planned and actual publication dates.

The monthly publication is based on the most recent available final data. For this publication, the Maternity Services Monthly Statistics report is published within four weeks of the submission window closing.

The Maternity Services Monthly Statistics report for January 2025 data was released on the pre-announced publication date and is therefore deemed to be punctual.

Coherence is the degree to which data that are derived from different sources or methods, but refer to the same topic, are similar. Comparability is the degree to which data can be compared over time and domain.

Coherence

There is no other monthly publication that includes the same measures as are included in this publication. 

As well as this monthly report on maternity services, NHS England also publish the annual NHS Maternity Statistics report. This annual publication uses Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data submitted to NHS England and has been published annually since 2001-02. The latest report also includes 2023-24 annual data from the MSDS.

Accessibility is the ease with which users are able to access the data, also reflecting the format in which the data are available and the availability of supporting information. Clarity refers to the quality and sufficiency of the metadata, illustrations and accompanying advice.

Accessibility

Alongside this background quality document, an executive summary is made freely accessible via the NHS England website (former NHS Digital website) as an HTML page together with a supporting monthly data file in machine-readable format (with an accompanying metadata document).

Re-use of our data is subject to conditions outlined here: https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions

Data Services for Commissioners Regional Offices (DSCROs) can obtain a record level extract of data relevant to the commissioners that they support and can share data with these commissioners subject to the relevant data sharing agreements being in place. Information about DSCROs is available from https://digital.nhs.uk/services/data-services-for-commissioners-dsfc

Clarity

For each provisional and final month's data published, two monthly data files are presented as a CSV file with an accompanying data quality CSV file. There is also an accompanying metadata file in MS Excel format. A broad definition of each measure, including the data items used in the analysis and constructions, are contained within the metadata file. Terminology is defined where appropriate.

Full details of the way that MSDS returns are processed, which will be of use to analysts and other users of these data, are provided in the MSDS User Guidance, available on the NHS England website (former NHS Digital website): https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-collections-and-data-sets/data-sets/maternity-services-data-set

In order to prevent disclosure of identities or information about service users, all figures for all organisations which submitted are rounded according to the suppression methodology guidance for this dataset, as follows: counts of zero are shown as zero, counts of 1-7 are rounded to 5, and all other counts are rounded to the nearest 5, with rates (where relevant) calculated from the rounded numerator and denominator numbers. There are four exceptions to this, for rare events, where rates are calculated from unrounded numbers but are not shown where the numerator is less than 8. This applies to CQIMTears, CQIMPPH, CQIMPreterm, and CQIMApgar.

This refers to the extent to which different aspects of quality are balanced against each other.

The format of this publication meets user needs for a greater wealth of information on maternity services in England. Benefits to users include the publication of detailed data on a monthly basis together with associated data quality measures, as well as a visual representation of the national picture on a monthly basis.

The aggregate underlying data provides a much greater scope of analysis and will support a variety of local uses as well as meeting our obligations under the Code of Practice for Statistics and the Transparency Agenda.

The format of this publication balances the need for increased frequency of reporting and scope of analysis with NHS England resources and production time. NHS England is publishing the data in an HTML format, whilst supporting the Open Data initiative by also publishing data in a machine-readable format. By publishing a range of clearly defined measures in a timely fashion we hope to support discussions between providers and commissioners about caseload and activity and promote a virtuous cycle of improving data quality, through use.

For MSDS version 2.0 analysis, we stopped producing the basic suite of data tables as part of this publication. However, the machine-readable data files are very detailed and allow data users to easily produce custom tabulations as required for their own analytical purposes.

This refers to the processes for finding out about users and uses, and their views on the statistical products.

The purpose of the MSDS monthly reports is to provide maternity service providers, commissioners and other stakeholders with timely information about activity. This is intended to support changes in commissioning arrangements as services move from block commissioning to commissioning based on activity and outcomes for mothers and babies.

For members of the public, researchers and other stakeholders, the release provides up to date information about the people in contact with services.

NHS Digital, prior to the merger with NHS England, held a number of workshops for maternity service providers and system suppliers, providing updates on the development of the data set and allowing clinicians, system administrators and informatics staff to provide feedback during the development stage. NHS England continues to hold workshops with service providers and system suppliers, providing relevant updates on data quality and future development of the data set, and obtaining feedback on use of the data. 

NHS Digital, prior to the merger with NHS England, also held workshops with analysts who use MSDS data and other maternity data to seek feedback to inform further development of the monthly reports and other outputs and encourage wider use of MSDS data.

This refers to the effectiveness, efficiency and economy of the statistical output.

As a 'secondary uses' data set, the MSDS does not require the collection of new data items by maternity providers. It re-uses existing clinical and operational data for purposes other than direct patient care.

Only three of the data tables are required to flow in every MSDS submission (MSD001, MSD002 and MSD101); completion of the remaining tables is only necessary when activity has occurred that is captured within these tables.

This refers to the procedures and policy used to ensure sound confidentiality, security and transparent practices.

All publications are subject to a standard NHS England risk assessment prior to issue. Disclosure control is implemented where deemed necessary.

Please see links below to relevant NHS Digital policies, these will be replaced with new combined NHS England policies in time: