Skip to main content

Publication, Part of

Maternity Services Monthly Statistics, Final June 2024, Provisional July 2024, official statistics

Official statistics

Data quality statement

Important information for July 2024 provisional data

The Maternity Services Monthly Statistics publication includes provisional data and final data. 

This month's publication contains both the final June 2024 data and the provisional July 2024 data. This provisional data will be superseded next month by the publication of final July 2024 data, accompanied by provisional August 2024 data.

In April 2023 we moved from processing data submissions at only one point at the end of the two-month submission window, to processing the data submissions at two points: mid-way through and at the end of the two-month submission window. This means that submissions made in the first month of the submissions window are processed as the provisional submission of the respective reporting period and produce provisional statistics. We run final processing on submissions at the end of the second month for final national analysis and reporting purposes. The latest MSDS v2.0 submission dates are available as part of the SDCS Cloud submission tool information.

Data completeness

The MSDS records for April 2023 were the first provisional data to be received and published under the new submission model. Submission of provisional data has increased over time but not all trusts are yet submitting provisional data.

116 Trusts of the 120 in scope for July 2024 have submitted data, with 116 submitting data on booking appointments and 116 submitting data on births.

Counts of babies that were fully or partially breastfed at 6 to 8 weeks old (CQIMBreastfeeding6to8Weeks) are not included in provisional data files or dashboard data, as they rely upon data from the Community Services Dataset (CSDS) which is not available for publication within the required timeframe.


Important information for June 2024 final data

Measures removed from the publication in 2022 and 2023: Personalised Care and Support Plans (PCSP) metrics and some Clinical Quality Improvement Metric Data Quality (CQIMDQ) metrics

Following feedback, the decision was taken to revise the Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST) Maternity Incentive Scheme (MIS) Safety Action 2 criteria relating to Personalised Care and Support Plans (PCSP) and remove the relevant metrics from this publication series. Also removed were CQIMDQ35, CQIMDQ40, CQIMDQ41, and CQIMDQ42 from the calculation of Robson Group CQIMs in 2022, and CQIMDQ19 in 2023.

Data completeness following the move to MSDS v.2.0

The Maternity Services Monthly Statistics reports for April 2019 onwards were the first to come from the new version of the Maternity Services Data Set (MSDSv2).

This version of the data set had numerous changes; to field names, table names, the clinical coding we receive and the structure of the data set itself. Our collection portal was also redeveloped, to enable consistency in submissions and efficiency in analysis and data linkage in the fullness of time. System suppliers are at different stages on developing their new solution and delivering that to trusts. In some cases this has limited the aspects of data that could be submitted to NHS England.

These changes have meant that we did not initially received as much data from every trust as we did in early 2019 under the previous version of the data set. Some tables are mandatory for upload, and therefore included in the submission. Whilst all tables are mandatory, not all are required for an upload to be successful. Their completeness is improving over time, and we continue to look at ways of supporting these developments.

120 Trusts of the 120 in scope for June 2024 have submitted data, with 120 submitting data on booking appointments and 120 submitting data on births.

Certain information such as birth weight and smoking status are submitted using clinical codes. For some metrics only information coded in SNOMED is included in this publication which will result in an undercount of the true figure. We have been working on the process of mapping information submitted in other classifications such as Read, OPCS or ICD10 into SNOMED and will revise any affected data once this has been completed.

Statistics on Continuity of Carer have been published to provide data submitters and users with insight into the quality and completeness of their data. The ability to capture Continuity of Carer information was introduced as part of the move to the new data set and therefore data quality and coverage is variable between organisations, as systems and processes are developed to capture this information. Due to variations in data quality and completeness, these statistics may not accurately reflect the true number of women placed on a Continuity of Carer pathway at this early stage of development.

Statistics on the Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle version 2, and more recently version 3, are published to provide data submitters and users with insight into the quality and completeness of their data. Due to variations in data quality and completeness, these statistics may not be an accurate reflection of trusts' performance at this early stage of development. A numerator and denominator are shown for all providers.


Known Issues

Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RFF) reported fewer bookings and deliveries than expected in their June 2024 MSDS submission. Therefore, caution should be used when interpreting their maternity care activity figures included in this publication.

Site of booking contains a high proportion of GP practice codes in addition to hospital site codes. This is because the initial antenatal booking often takes place in non-hospital settings, such as the patient's home or GP practice.


Purpose of this page

This page aims to provide users with an evidence-based assessment of the quality of the statistical output of the Maternity Services Monthly Statistics publication by reporting against those of the nine European Statistical System (ESS) quality dimensions and principles appropriate to this output.

In doing so, this meets our obligation to comply with the UK Statistics Authority (UKSA) Code of Practice for Official Statistics, particularly Principle Q3, which states:

“Producers of statistics and data should explain clearly how they assure themselves that statistics and data are accurate, reliable, coherent and timely”.

For each dimension this page describes how this applies to the publication and references any measures in the accompanying monthly data quality measures report that are relevant for assessing the quality of the output.

These statistics are now classified as official. More information about official statistics can be found on the UK Statistics Authority website.


Assessment of statistics against quality dimensions and principles

The degree to which the statistical product meets user needs in both coverage and content.

This publication comprises a set of reports which have been produced from NHS-funded maternity service providers’ monthly MSDS submissions. It provides the timeliest information from the MSDS.

The MSDS does not cover non-NHS funded maternity services provided by independent organisations (e.g. private clinics).

The MSDS has been developed to help achieve better outcomes of care for mothers, babies and children. Monthly outputs from the MSDS include:

  • An HTML executive summary
  • Two CSV files, CSV Data and Measures, containing the aggregate underlying data for final month data, and two for provisional month data.
  • A CSV Data Quality file showing national and provider-level data quality measures for final month data, and one for provisional month data.
  • A detailed Metadata file describing all of the measures in the analysis. This includes, for each measure, how it has been constructed from providers’ submissions and how and where it is used.

Relevance

Official Statistics

The statistics in this publication are now marked as official. 

The OSR guidance sets out eight criteria for identifying Official Statistics, including two which are mandatory. The guide states that “While the first two are mandatory, it is not necessary for all of the others to be met. This is not a “pass or fail” checklist, and the importance placed on each consideration will depend on the context. Heads of Profession can bring in other relevant considerations that have a bearing on the trustworthiness, quality, and value of the statistics.”

Our statistical practice is regulated by the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR). OSR sets the standards of trustworthiness, quality, and value in the Code of Practice for Statistics that all producers of official statistics should adhere to. You are welcome to contact us directly with any comments about how we meet these standards. Alternatively, you can contact OSR by emailing [email protected] or via the OSR website.

The table below reproduces from the guidance the name and detail of the eight criteria with a comment added as to how the Maternity Services Monthly Statistics publication continues to meet the standards set out for Official Statistics.

Criteria Category Criteria detail Maternity Monthly Statistics Monthly publication position
Mandatory The organisation that produced the statistics is within a Crown body or named on an Official Statistics Order and so the numbers that they produce are within the scope of the Statistics Act. Yes. NHS England is the organisation responsible for producing these statistics.
Mandatory The statistics are put in the public domain through a regular output or ad-hoc release.

Yes. These statistics are published monthly on the NHS England (legacy NHS Digital) website

The monthly publication includes:

  • An HTML executive summary including key national headline statistics.
  • Two CSV files, CSV Data and Measures, containing the aggregate underlying data for final month data, and two for provisional month data.
  • A CSV Data Quality file showing national and provider-level data quality measures for final month data, and one for provisional month data.
  • Technical documentation about publication methodology (in the form of an accompanying metadata file).
  • A dashboard allowing users to access data in an interactive manner, including breakdowns by geography.

The publication produces all outputs in line with Official Statistic requirements.

Materiality The data are used publicly in support of major decisions on policy, resource allocation or other topics of public interest.

Yes. The MSDS information captured from NHS-funded maternity services, provides reliable information for:

  • local and national monitoring
  • reporting for effective commissioning
  • monitoring outcomes
  • addressing health inequalities

and is used as a tool for local and national service monitoring and improvement. This publication includes a broad range of measures that provide clinicians, commissioners and patients with a comprehensive picture of how maternity services are operating, and is the only source of data for some areas of maternity services. The publication is therefore used by NHS England and others to inform and assess policy.

Public interest The data have a high public profile, attract controversy or debate when published and / or public debate would be better informed if they were classified as official statistics.

Yes. Data on Maternity services has been collected through the Maternity Services Dataset (MSDS) since 2015. This dataset covers all activity relating to the mother and baby (or babies), from the point of the first booking appointment until mother and baby (or babies) are discharged. The MSDS dataset is the most comprehensive source of data available regarding the pregnancy pathway and maternity care received by women in England and has been managed by NHS England since its introduction in 2015. MSDS is the only source of data for some areas of maternity services, hence is often relevant to public discussions about maternity care.

The MSDS provides comparative data used to improve clinical quality and service efficiency and to commission services in a way that improves health and reduces inequalities. The data collected will assist care providers, commissioners, clinicians, service users and members of the wider public in understanding what maternity care is delivered, supporting commissioning, payment, planning and outcomes monitoring.

This is a high-profile area as the government aims to improve the provision of maternity services, in line with the recent Three year delivery plan for maternity and neonatal services. Therefore, maternity data publications such as this one, are of great interest to the public.

Methods used The data are collected and results compiled using widely accepted statistical methods that are appropriate for the intended use.

Yes. Details of the methodology to create the published measures are outlined in the Maternity monthly publication's metadata file. Where derived fields from MSDS are used, details of how these derived fields were ascertained can be found in the MSDS Technical Output specification.

Where appropriate, the methodology for this publication aligns with other established Official Statistics and NHS England communicates any changes to how we produce our statistics in advance of these changes taking effect. This communication is through Methodological Change Notices (MCN).

In accordance with the suppression methodology guidance for MSDS, to protect patient confidentiality, rounding has been applied to all figures as follows: counts of zero are shown as zero, counts of 1-7 are rounded to 5, and all other counts are rounded to the nearest 5, with rates (where relevant) calculated from the rounded numerator and denominator numbers. There are four exceptions to this, for rare events, where rates are calculated from unrounded numbers but are not shown where the numerator is less than 8. This applies to CQIMTears, CQIMPPH, CQIMPreterm, and CQIMApgar.

Independence The data were produced by appropriately skilled analysts who are free from conflicts of interest, including political and commercial pressures.

Yes. All statistics present within this publication are produced by NHS England analysts with expertise in creating and assuring data outputs.

A lead analyst oversees production of each monthly publication ensuring all statistics are fully assured and delivered to the appropriate standard.

Quality Data inputs and statistical outputs are of sufficient quality to support the intended uses.

Yes. The Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS) is a patient-level data set that captures key information at each stage of the maternity care pathway including mother’s demographics, booking appointments, admissions and re-admissions, screening tests, labour and delivery along with baby’s demographics, admissions, diagnoses and screening tests.

Known data quality issues related to specific providers and/or fields in the dataset are published as part of the monthly publication series. Every month an overview of data quality in MSDS is published. There is a data quality statement, a Data Quality CSV file, and multiple dashboards available via the Monthly MSDS publication series. These include an interactive dashboard which displays data quality metrics, such as coverage, completeness of individual fields and VODIM (Valid, Other, Default, Invalid, Missing), and a dashboard dedicated to the quality of SNOMED reporting.

Considerable work has been done to understand which providers should be submitting to the MSDS each month, and to on-board providers and support them to submit data. Targeting of key areas to improve data quality has been achieved through a dedicated data quality mailbox, provider support, the Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts Maternity Incentive (CNST) Scheme, and communications via newsletters and updating of guidance. This last item includes the more recent development of a guidance hub which is a collection of documents, videos and useful links to support providers and users of MSDS data.

Data quality and completeness of the MSDS dataset is of a good standard and continues to improve. We have a consistent number of providers submitting to the MSDS dataset each month, and receive data from all or almost all expected reporting Trusts each month.

Data in this publication are presented in various ways in order to meet user needs: a HTML executive summary, various CSV files containing detailed data measures and data quality reports in Excel and an interactive dashboard allowing users to access data more easily. The variety or formats empowers stakeholders, to freely access and use the data as required.

Representative The statistics are broadly representative of the population that they are designed to measure. Please refer to the guidance document for more detailed information.

Yes. The MSDS provides a national standard for gathering data from maternity healthcare providers in England by covering key information captured from NHS-funded maternity services. Trusts providing maternity services are legally mandated to submit data relating to the services provided. Data submitted should therefore be representative of all activity currently happening at both an individual provider level and nationally.

Information for this publication has been collected from 120 providers across England in the previous 6 months (as of the March 2024 reporting period). Each month we receive data from all, or almost all, expected providers of MSDS data. The MSDS dataset is the most comprehensive source of data available regarding the pregnancy pathway and maternity care received by women in England and has been managed by NHS England since its introduction in 2015. This supports the objective of producing data which is representative of maternity services and their users across England.

Where possible data is presented at different reporting levels – including Local Maternity and Neonatal System (LMNS), MBRRACE group, NHS England Region, Provider, and England level – to allow users to access information about the maternity services in their areas.

 

The Maternity Services Monthly Statistics publication uses the newest version of the data set, MSDS.v.2, which has been in place since April 2019. The new data set was a significant development, with changes including the introduction of new clinical coding. This was a major change, so data quality and coverage initially reduced from the levels seen in earlier publications. Hence the publication was labelled with an Experimental Statistics (now Official Statistics in development) badge whilst work was ongoing to improve MSDS.v.2 data completeness and quality, and to accommodate the development of new statistics.

As evidenced in the table above, it is the case that the measures presented within the publication are now well established and consistently produced using high quality data representative of maternity services in England. Therefore, it is considered that the information within these publications is of a standard to be categorised as Official Statistics, and as a result the Official Statistics in development badge has been removed. We shall review whether any existing and new measures need to be specifically labelled as Official Statistics in development, where the data quality or completeness is yet to be sufficiently improved.

This Official Statistics status indicates that the published statistics have public value, are high quality, and are produced by people and organisations that are trustworthy. For more information see the UK Code of Practice for Statistics.

Feedback

Feedback on this publication is welcome and can be provided to [email protected]. Please quote "Maternity Monthly statistics" in the email subject line.


Accuracy and reliability

Accuracy is the proximity between an estimate and the unknown true value.

Reliability is the closeness of early estimates to subsequent estimated values.

Accuracy

The MSDS is a rich, person level data set that records packages of care received by individuals in contact with NHS-funded maternity services. NHS England provides a number of different reports at different stages in the data flow to ensure that the submitted data reflects the services that have been provided:

For data suppliers only:

At the point of submission:

  • Providers receive immediate feedback on the quality of their submission through a validation file. This file includes record-level reports of any submission errors, giving the data providers detailed information about which records produced which errors.

On receipt of processed data by NHS England:

  • A variety of data quality checks are run as part of the validation and load process for monthly data, prior to production of this monthly release. Where there are concerns about data quality we contact providers directly so that any issues with local data extraction processes can be addressed for a future submission.

For all users:

As part of this publication, we publish a CSV file of data quality of submissions from maternity service providers.

Users of the data must make their own assessment of the quality of the data for a particular purpose, drawing on these resources.

In addition, local knowledge, or other comparative data sources, may be required to distinguish changes in volume between reporting periods that reflect changes in service delivery from those that are an artefact of changes in data quality.

The analysis in this report is based on the latest data submitted by providers during the two month window to provide data. Any data which are re-submitted by a provider during the submission window will be used in place of an earlier submission within the window. We invite and welcome feedback from users on our constructions.

Reliability

Coverage – are all eligible providers submitting data?

All providers of NHS-funded maternity services should submit MSDS data. However, at present not all providers are making full submissions. 

All trusts made a submission, however some trusts submitted a limited number of tables. Detailed information on submission completeness can be found in the accompanying data quality file.

This publication reports on activity that was submitted for the June 2024 reporting period.  As a revised national level data set there have been a number of issues in terms of non-response from providers which in turn has an impact on the geographical coverage expected of the data set, hence some caution should be taken when interpreting the data at levels higher than individual provider level.

Because of this, no figures derived from the MSDS data have been presented as England total figures, rather they are presented in terms of all providers who submitted data to the MSDS for the reporting period in question. While the number of submitting providers is all we expect, the number of providers submitting valid data for each data table and data item varies widely. Totals therefore continue to be presented as 'all submitters' values, and users of the data should consider the coverage for the relevant analysis when interpreting the data.

Coverage – is data for all eligible people included in the submission?

Local knowledge may be required to assess the completeness of a submission, based on information about local caseload. This publication provides detailed information about activity and providers and commissioners are encouraged to review this to ensure that submissions accurately reflect the local situation. Providers should also use all the aggregate record counts produced at the point of submission as part of the Data Summary Reports to check coverage in key areas (e.g. number of booking appointments.)

Where an organisation is submitting delivery data to MSDS, the number of deliveries reported in a month can be compared to the 2022-23 monthly average number of deliveries in HES to review the levels of activity reported in the MSDS for each organisation (noting that MSDS is not limited to births in hospital). Where an organisation has not submitted delivery data to MSDS, a similar comparison can be made using the number of booking appointments in the month, bearing in mind that not all booking appointments will lead to a birth for that pregnancy within a reporting organisation. 

Duplication

Validations are in place to ensure that there is only one booking appointment for each woman submitted to NHS England per organisation for the particular reporting period. It is possible that one woman may have multiple booking appointments recorded for the same pregnancy for different providers. For any calculated total value presented in this report a woman is only counted once in relation to the activity related to the booking appointment. For example, if a woman is reported for a booking appointment by two separate organisations within the same NHS England Region then they would be counted in any total for each of these providers presented at the provider level but would only be counted once for the overall NHS England Region. However, if the woman was reported by two separate providers within two separate NHS England Regions then they would be counted in the overall total calculated for each NHS England Region.

If a woman is reported for a booking appointment by two separate organisations within the same NHS England Region and different data are submitted by each provider then this woman may be counted twice for the overall NHS England Region total. For example, where a woman has an age recorded as 39 by one provider and 40 by another provider this woman would be counted in the NHS England Region total twice, once in the '35 to 39' age group and once in the '40 to 44' age group.

Similarly, a baby reported by two separate organisations within the same NHS England Region with an Apgar score at 5 minutes of 6 recorded by one provider and 8 by another provider would be counted in the NHS England Region total twice, once in the '0 to 6' group and once in the '7 to 10' group.

Timeliness of recording events on local systems

Whilst local systems may be continuously updated, the MSDS submission process provides a time-limited opportunity for data relevant to each month to be submitted. The submission window opens the day after the reporting month and remains open for two months. This means that the timeliness of recording all relevant activity on local systems has an impact on the completeness of the MSDS submission. For example, a booking appointment made in April 2023, but not entered onto the local system until July 2023, will not have been included in the April 2023 submission (deadline end of June 2023). Providers should use the data summary reports produced at the point of submission to ensure that all relevant data has been included.

In May 2023 we moved from processing data submissions at only one point at the end of the two-month reporting window, to processing the data submissions at two points: mid-way through and at the end of the two-month reporting window. This means that submissions made in the first month of the reporting window will now be processed as the provisional submission of the respective reporting period and will produce provisional statistics. We will continue to run final processing on submissions at the end of the second month for final national analysis and reporting purposes. For example, a booking appointment made in April 2023 and included in the MSDS submission of April activity before the end of May 2023 will be included in the provisional April 2023 published figures, but if it was not included in the MSDS submission of April activity until sometime during June 2023 then it would only be included in the later final April 2023 published figures.

The submission requirements for MSDS are that all appropriate activity (e.g. booking appointment, dating scans, etc.) be included in the submission for each month in which they start, continue or end. It is important that data providers ensure that NHS numbers are submitted consistently because this is a key piece of information for creating the person identifiers in our records.

Quality of experimental analysis

It should be noted that these statistics are presently experimental in nature and are likely to be subject to further refinement; reference should be made to all accompanying footnotes and commentary when using these statistics.


Timeliness and punctuality

Timeliness refers to the time gap between publication and the reference period. Punctuality refers to the gap between planned and actual publication dates.

The monthly publication is based on the most recent available final data. For this publication, the Maternity Services Monthly Statistics report is published within four weeks of the submission window closing.

The Maternity Services Monthly Statistics report for June 2024 data was released on the pre-announced publication date and is therefore deemed to be punctual.


Coherence and comparability

Coherence is the degree to which data that are derived from different sources or methods, but refer to the same topic, are similar. Comparability is the degree to which data can be compared over time and domain.

Coherence

There is no other monthly publication that includes the same measures as are included in this publication. 

As well as this monthly report on maternity services, NHS England also publish the annual NHS Maternity Statistics report. This annual publication uses Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data submitted to NHS England and has been published annually since 2001-02. The latest report also includes 2022-23 annual data from the MSDS.

MSDS deliveries comparison with annual HES statistics
Organisation Code Organisation Name MSDS deliveries, Jun 2024 HES deliveries average per month 22-23 MSDS as a proportion of HES (%)
RCF AIREDALE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 120 150 80
RTK ASHFORD AND ST PETER'S HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 235 235 100
RF4 BARKING, HAVERING AND REDBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 600 585 103
RFF BARNSLEY HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 5 245 2
R1H BARTS HEALTH NHS TRUST 1055 1145 92
RC9 BEDFORDSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 620 675 92
RQ3 BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 695 595 117
RXL BLACKPOOL TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 220 210 105
RMC BOLTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 400 460 87
RAE BRADFORD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 410 395 104
RXQ BUCKINGHAMSHIRE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 275 370 74
RWY CALDERDALE AND HUDDERSFIELD NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 340 345 99
RGT CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 370 445 83
RQM CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 770 1035 74
RFS CHESTERFIELD ROYAL HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 215 235 91
RJR COUNTESS OF CHESTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 150 180 83
RXP COUNTY DURHAM AND DARLINGTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 380 350 109
RJ6 CROYDON HEALTH SERVICES NHS TRUST 270 250 108
RN7 DARTFORD AND GRAVESHAM NHS TRUST 350 385 91
RP5 DONCASTER AND BASSETLAW TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 340 365 93
RBD DORSET COUNTY HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 135 120 113
RWH EAST AND NORTH HERTFORDSHIRE NHS TRUST 345 400 86
RJN EAST CHESHIRE NHS TRUST 105 0 0
RVV EAST KENT HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 445 495 90
RXR EAST LANCASHIRE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 480 465 103
RDE EAST SUFFOLK AND NORTH ESSEX NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 490 535 92
RXC EAST SUSSEX HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 205 225 91
RVR EPSOM AND ST HELIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 265 305 87
RDU FRIMLEY HEALTH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 705 135 522
RR7 GATESHEAD HEALTH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 205 140 146
RLT GEORGE ELIOT HOSPITAL NHS TRUST 175 175 100
RTE GLOUCESTERSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 430 465 92
RN3 GREAT WESTERN HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 295 300 98
RJ1 GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 425 515 83
RN5 HAMPSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 410 390 105
RCD HARROGATE AND DISTRICT NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 150 135 111
RQX HOMERTON HEALTHCARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 465 455 102
RWA HULL UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 375 395 95
RYJ IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 795 760 105
R1F ISLE OF WIGHT NHS TRUST 75 75 100
RGP JAMES PAGET UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 130 145 90
RNQ KETTERING GENERAL HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 230 260 88
RJZ KING'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 540 620 87
RAX KINGSTON HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 335 375 89
RXN LANCASHIRE TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 350 340 103
RR8 LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 665 700 95
RJ2 LEWISHAM AND GREENWICH NHS TRUST 500 585 85
REP LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 540 595 91
R1K LONDON NORTH WEST UNIVERSITY HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 160 315 51
RWF MAIDSTONE AND TUNBRIDGE WELLS NHS TRUST 435 470 93
R0A MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 1210 1305 93
RPA MEDWAY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 360 370 97
RBN MERSEY AND WEST LANCASHIRE TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 420 485 87
RAJ MID AND SOUTH ESSEX NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 880 930 95
RBT MID CHESHIRE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 225 245 92
RXF MID YORKSHIRE TEACHING NHS TRUST 450 445 101
RD8 MILTON KEYNES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 300 265 113
RM1 NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 380 400 95
RVJ NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST 515 435 118
RNN NORTH CUMBRIA INTEGRATED CARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 195 205 95
RAP NORTH MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL NHS TRUST 260 315 83
RVW NORTH TEES AND HARTLEPOOL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 305 205 149
RGN NORTH WEST ANGLIA NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 440 485 91
RNS NORTHAMPTON GENERAL HOSPITAL NHS TRUST 335 345 97
RM3 NORTHERN CARE ALLIANCE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 385 360 107
RJL NORTHERN LINCOLNSHIRE AND GOOLE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 275 300 92
RTF NORTHUMBRIA HEALTHCARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 325 260 125
RX1 NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 640 615 104
RTH OXFORD UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 590 610 97
RHU PORTSMOUTH HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE TRUST 450 375 120
RHW ROYAL BERKSHIRE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 365 385 95
REF ROYAL CORNWALL HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 295 315 94
RH8 ROYAL DEVON UNIVERSITY HEALTHCARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 355 540 66
RAL ROYAL FREE LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 500 625 80
RA2 ROYAL SURREY COUNTY HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 225 215 105
RD1 ROYAL UNITED HOSPITALS BATH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 290 340 85
RNZ SALISBURY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 155 170 91
RXK SANDWELL AND WEST BIRMINGHAM HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 430 430 100
RHQ SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 430 455 95
RK5 SHERWOOD FOREST HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 245 280 88
RH5 SOMERSET NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 360 330 109
RTR SOUTH TEES HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 395 375 105
R0B SOUTH TYNESIDE AND SUNDERLAND NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 360 295 122
RJC SOUTH WARWICKSHIRE UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 270 255 106
RJ7 ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 285 355 80
RWJ STOCKPORT NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 195 270 72
RTP SURREY AND SUSSEX HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 305 420 73
RMP TAMESIDE AND GLOSSOP INTEGRATED CARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 165 175 94
RNA THE DUDLEY GROUP NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 330 340 97
RAS THE HILLINGDON HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 245 330 74
RTD THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 555 485 114
RQW THE PRINCESS ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL NHS TRUST 275 145 190
RCX THE QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL, KING'S LYNN, NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 170 160 106
RFR THE ROTHERHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 175 205 85
RL4 THE ROYAL WOLVERHAMPTON NHS TRUST 455 420 108
RXW THE SHREWSBURY AND TELFORD HOSPITAL NHS TRUST 330 340 97
RA9 TORBAY AND SOUTH DEVON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 140 15 933
RWD UNITED LINCOLNSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 370 365 101
RRV UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 435 440 99
RHM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 475 415 114
RRK UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 885 710 125
RA7 UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BRISTOL AND WESTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 430 375 115
RKB UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIRE NHS TRUST 380 445 85
R0D UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS DORSET NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 330 320 103
RTG UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF DERBY AND BURTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 550 710 77
RWE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST 750 775 97
RTX UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF MORECAMBE BAY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 220 225 98
RJE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF NORTH MIDLANDS NHS TRUST 445 505 88
RK9 UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS PLYMOUTH NHS TRUST 255 290 88
RYR UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS SUSSEX NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 665 735 90
RBK WALSALL HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 380 305 125
RWW WARRINGTON AND HALTON TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 195 210 93
RWG WEST HERTFORDSHIRE TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 260 315 83
RGR WEST SUFFOLK NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 185 180 103
RKE WHITTINGTON HEALTH NHS TRUST 160 245 65
RBL WIRRAL UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 225 240 94
RWP WORCESTERSHIRE ACUTE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 405 390 104
RRF WRIGHTINGTON, WIGAN AND LEIGH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 140 130 108
RLQ WYE VALLEY NHS TRUST 155 135 115
RCB YORK AND SCARBOROUGH TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 355 360 99
Babies readmitted to hospital who were under 30 days old

In the publication of April 2024 MSDS data, we introduced a new metric to this publication which counts the number of babies born in hospital then discharged home, who were then readmitted to hospital while still under 30 days old. This new Clinical Quality Improvement Metric (CQIM) uses both the Maternity Services Dataset (MSDS) and Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES). To support this metric and ensure we publish figures only where the underlying data is of good completeness and quality, we have also introduced five new CQIM data quality metrics: these are CQIMDQ46 to CQIMDQ50. 

The figures for the new CQIMReadmissions metric and the five supporting data quality metrics can be found in the Measures file available for download as part of this publication and the CQIM and CQIM+ pages in the National Maternity Dashboard, and information on the construction of this metric can be found in the accompanying Metadata file

This is the first metric included in this publication which uses linked MSDS and HES data. NHS England has not previously published data covering this postnatal hospital discharge and readmission activity. Data providers are currently at different stages of maturity with their submissions and with ensuring consistency between the two datasets, something the data quality metrics can help them understand and improve. This data is therefore initially classified as an Official Statistic in development whilst data providers and users have the opportunity to familiarise themselves with the data fields and the metric construction being used, and provide any feedback.  

The HES data used for this metric comes from the most recent data received during the annual HES submission and processing cycle, and is therefore provisional and likely to differ from the final HES data product which is assembled at the end of each financial year and includes any changes to the data made during and shortly after the end of the financial year. For more information, please see the HES guidance which includes details about the data collection process and the creation of the final year data. The HES guidance includes links to the existing monthly and annual HES official statistic reporting series, which can be used to understand more about how the general results of the provisional monthly reporting have compared to the final annual figures published over previous years.

Data completeness, inclusions, and exclusions 

This metric includes only those readmissions which involve an overnight stay and therefore does not cover Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) which is the provision of same day care for emergency patients who would otherwise be admitted to hospital. Under this care model, patients presenting at hospital with relevant conditions can be rapidly assessed, diagnosed, and treated without being admitted to a ward, and if clinically safe to do so, will go home on the same day that their care is provided. This metric does not cover all hospital-based births and is primarily focused on the lower-risk majority cohort who are, for example, born at term and within expected birthweight ranges. Babies will only be counted in this metric where the trust in which they were born is the one which submitted the data about the birth to MSDS. 

All activity recorded in HES that occurs under one care provider may be recorded as multiple episodes but will come under one overarching spell, given a single unique Spell Identifier. Where a patient is transferred to another healthcare provider this spell will end, and the new care provider will create a new Spell Identifier – although the underlying care has not ended. The linked MSDS and HES data contains the care provider Spell Identifiers but does not currently contain the unique Continuous Inpatient (CIP) Spells Identifiers, and therefore may incorrectly identify some discharge and readmission dates where a baby was transferred between care providers. Our investigations suggest this affects a very small proportion of discharges and readmissions, but is useful context for anyone using the published figures. 

Further information about which births and readmissions are included in or excluded from this metric can be found in the accompanying Metadata file which provides details on the construction of this metric. 

Breastfeeding at 6 to 8 weeks after birth

From the publication of March 2022 data, we introduced a new measure to this publication which counts the percentage of babies aged 9 weeks old who were fully or partially breastfed between 6 - 8 weeks old. This Clinical Quality Improvement Metric (CQIM) uses both the Maternity Services Dataset (MSDS) and Community Services Dataset (CSDS). The data for this CQIMBreastfeeding6to8weeks metric can be found in the Measures file available for download, and information on the construction of this measure can be found in the accompanying Metadata file.

From the publication of September 2023 data, we have introduced a set of new data quality measures to accompany the CQIM breastfeeding 6 to 8 weeks measure. These new measures are CQIMDQ43, CQIMDQ44 and CQIMDQ45. In addition, CQIMDQ10 is also being used to assess the quality of the CQIM breastfeeding 6 to 8 weeks data. Therefore, from September 2023 onwards, data which is presented for this measure at National / Organisation / MBRRACE level may differ from previous months. A rate is only calculated when the data from an organisation is of sufficient quality and completeness. This also applies at MBRRACE and National level, meaning data is only included where an organisation passed the required data quality thresholds. Further information about the construction of these measures can be found in the metadata

The official statistics for breastfeeding prevalence at 6 to 8 weeks after birth are produced quarterly and annually by the Office of Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID). This aggregate data is collected through an interim reporting system set up to collect health visiting activity data at a local authority level and is submitted by local authorities on a voluntary basis. While coverage is generally good, the data quality has not reached the desired level to remove the statistics in development status.

This new CQIMBreastfeeding6to8weeks data published by NHS England is an experimental use of record level data from the (CSDS) and the (MSDS) to begin to produce a comparable and more powerful statistic to that currently published by OHID. Record level data supports reporting on inequalities such as deprivation and ethnicity. The longer-term strategic solution for data collection and reporting for these metrics is the Community Services Dataset (CSDS) which will eventually replace the statistics currently published by OHID. While the CSDS is operational and reporting is underway, providers remain at different stages of maturity with their submissions and additional time is needed for this dataset to reach sufficient coverage. For this reason, it has been agreed that OHID’s interim reporting arrangements will continue for now.

NHS England previously produced a data collection on mothers initiating breastfeeding by NHS Trust and by CCG, which went up to March 2017. Over this same time period, the MSDS only reported the baby's first feed, which differed from the definition of initiation in the NHS England collection, so data is not exactly comparable between the two sources.

Smoking at time of delivery

Official statistics on Smoking at Time of Delivery (SATOD) are published by NHS England on a quarterly basis using aggregate returns from CCGs. The analysis of smoking at delivery recorded in the MSDS published for January 2017 includes a comparison with data from the SATOD collection for October – December 2016 to explore the quality of MSDS submissions.

Births in England and Wales: Office for National Statistics

The Office for National Statistics also publishes annual data on live births and stillbirths in England and Wales. These data are collated from local registrar records and are the most complete data source available. The latest publication for these data can be found here.


Accessibility and clarity

Accessibility is the ease with which users are able to access the data, also reflecting the format in which the data are available and the availability of supporting information. Clarity refers to the quality and sufficiency of the metadata, illustrations and accompanying advice.

Accessibility

Alongside this background quality document, an executive summary is made freely accessible via the NHS Digital website as an HTML page together with a supporting monthly data file in machine-readable format (with an accompanying metadata document).

Re-use of our data is subject to conditions outlined here: https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions

Data Services for Commissioners Regional Offices (DSCROs) can obtain a record level extract of data relevant to the Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) that they support and can share data with these CCGs subject to the relevant data sharing agreements being in place. Information about DSCROs is available from https://digital.nhs.uk/services/data-services-for-commissioners-dsfc

Clarity

For each provisional and final month's data published, two monthly data files are presented as a CSV file with an accompanying data quality CSV file. There is also an accompanying metadata file in MS Excel format. A broad definition of each measure, including the data items used in the analysis and constructions, are contained within the metadata file. Terminology is defined where appropriate.

Full details of the way that MSDS returns are processed, which will be of use to analysts and other users of these data, are provided in the MSDS User Guidance, available on the NHS Digital website: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-collections-and-data-sets/data-sets/maternity-services-data-set

In order to prevent disclosure of identities or information about service users, all figures for all organisations which submitted are rounded according to the suppression methodology guidance for this dataset, as follows: counts of zero are shown as zero, counts of 1-7 are rounded to 5, and all other counts are rounded to the nearest 5, with rates (where relevant) calculated from the rounded numerator and denominator numbers. There are four exceptions to this, for rare events, where rates are calculated from unrounded numbers but are not shown where the numerator is less than 8. This applies to CQIMTears, CQIMPPH, CQIMPreterm, and CQIMApgar.


Trade-offs between output quality components

This refers to the extent to which different aspects of quality are balanced against each other

The format of this publication meets user needs for a greater wealth of information on maternity services in England. Benefits to users include the publication of detailed data on a monthly basis together with associated data quality measures, as well as a visual representation of the national picture on a monthly basis.

The aggregate underlying data provides a much greater scope of analysis and will support a variety of local uses as well as meeting our obligations under the Code of Practice for Statistics and the Transparency Agenda.

The format of this publication balances the need for increased frequency of reporting and scope of analysis with NHS England resources and production time. NHS England is publishing the data in an HTML format, whilst supporting the Open Data initiative by also publishing data in a machine-readable format. By publishing a range of clearly defined measures in a timely fashion we hope to support discussions between providers and commissioners about caseload and activity and promote a virtuous cycle of improving data quality, through use.

For MSDS version 2.0 analysis, we stopped producing the basic suite of data tables as part of this publication. However, the machine-readable data files are very detailed and allow data users to easily produce custom tabulations as required for their own analytical purposes.


Assessment of user needs and perceptions

This refers to the processes for finding out about users and uses, and their views on the statistical products.

The purpose of the MSDS monthly reports is to provide maternity service providers, commissioners and other stakeholders with timely information about activity. This is intended to support changes in commissioning arrangements as services move from block commissioning to commissioning based on activity and outcomes for mothers and babies.

For members of the public, researchers and other stakeholders, the release provides up to date information about the people in contact with services.

NHS Digital, prior to the merger with NHS England, held a number of workshops for maternity service providers and system suppliers, providing updates on the development of the data set and allowing clinicians, system administrators and informatics staff to provide feedback during the development stage. NHS England continues to hold workshops with service providers and system suppliers, providing relevant updates on data quality and future development of the data set, and obtaining feedback on use of the data. 

NHS Digital, prior to the merger with NHS England, also held workshops with analysts who use MSDS data and other maternity data to seek feedback to inform further development of the monthly reports and other outputs and encourage wider use of MSDS data.


Balance between performance, cost, and respondent burden

This refers to the effectiveness, efficiency and economy of the statistical output.

As a 'secondary uses' data set, the MSDS does not require the collection of new data items by maternity providers. It re-uses existing clinical and operational data for purposes other than direct patient care.

Providers are not required to submit data held only on paper records as no provision has been made in the MSDS for the cost of transcribing these records to an electronic format.

Only three of the data tables are required to flow in every MSDS submission (MSD001, MSD002 and MSD101); completion of the remaining tables is only necessary when activity has occurred that is captured within these tables.


Confidentiality, transparency and security

This refers to the procedures and policy used to ensure sound confidentiality, security and transparent practices.

All publications are subject to a standard NHS Digital risk assessment prior to issue. Disclosure control is implemented where deemed necessary.

Please see links below to relevant NHS Digital policies, these will be replaced with new combined NHS England policies in time:


Administrative Sources

Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS): this is a patient-level data set that captures information about activity carried out by Maternity Services relating to a mother and baby(s), from the point of the first booking appointment until mother and baby(s) are discharged from maternity services. This is a secondary uses data set, which re-uses clinical and operational data for purposes other than direct patient care.



Last edited: 19 September 2024 9:31 am