Skip to main content

Publication, Part of

Maternity Services Monthly Statistics, Final June 2023, Provisional July 2023, experimental statistics

Official statistics

Data quality statement

Important information for July 2023 provisional data

This is the fourth publication of Maternity Services Monthly Statistics to include provisional data, in addition to the usual final data reported in this publication series. This publication change is occurring as we have moved to a provisional and final processing submission model for the Maternity Services Dataset (MSDS). Therefore this month's publication contains both the final June 2023 data and the provisional July 2023 data. This provisional data will be superseded next month by the publication of final July 2023 data, which will be accompanied by provisional August 2023 data.

We have moved from processing data submissions at only one point at the end of the two-month submission window, to processing the data submissions at two points: mid-way through and at the end of the two-month submission window. This means that submissions made in the first month of the submissions window will now be processed as the provisional submission of the respective reporting period and will produce provisional statistics. We will continue to run final processing on submissions at the end of the second month for final national analysis and reporting purposes. The latest MSDS v2.0 submission dates are available as part of the SDCS Cloud submission tool information.

This change was explained in more detail in this webinar for data submitters - for which a recording, slides, and transcript are available.

Data completeness

The MSDS records for April 2023 were the first provisional data to be received and published under the new submission model. This is the fourth month where provisional data has been received and processed, and as a result we have not received provisional data from every trust.

120 Trusts in scope for July 2023 have submitted data, with 120 submitting data on births.

Counts of babies that were fully or partially breastfed at 6 to 8 weeks old (CQIMBreastfeeding6to8Weeks) will not be available in the provisional data files or dashboard data, as this relies upon information from the Community Services Dataset (CSDS) which is not available for publication within the required timeframe.


Important information for June 2023 final data

Measures removed from the publication in 2022 and 2023: Personalised Care and Support Plans (PCSP) measures and some Clinical Quality Improvement Metric (CQIM) Data Quality measures

Following feedback, the decision was taken to revise the Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST) Maternity Incentive Scheme Safety Action 2 criteria relating to Personalised Care and Support Plans (PCSP). Due to this revision the existing metrics relating to PCSP were removed from this publication series. New criteria for assessment will be reflected in this publication series once agreed and available.

We also agreed to remove CQIMDQ35, CQIMDQ40, CQIMDQ41, and CQIMDQ42 from the calculation of Robson Group CQIMs in 2022, and the data for these measures has been removed from the data files, as of this publication of final June data.

Data completeness following the move to MSDS v.2.0

The Maternity Services Monthly Statistics reports for April 2019 onwards were the first to come from the new version of the Maternity Services Data Set (MSDSv2).

This version of the data set had numerous changes; to field names, table names, the clinical coding we receive and the structure of the data set itself. Our collection portal was also redeveloped, to enable consistency in submissions and efficiency in analysis and data linkage in the fullness of time. System suppliers are at different stages on developing their new solution and delivering that to trusts. In some cases this has limited the aspects of data that could be submitted to NHS England.

These changes have meant that we did not initially received as much data from every trust as we did in early 2019 under the previous version of the data set. Some tables are mandatory for upload, and therefore included in the submission. Whilst all tables are mandatory, not all are required for an upload to be successful. Their completeness is improving over time, and we continue to look at ways of supporting these developments.

121 Trusts in scope for June 2023 have submitted data, with 121 submitting data on births.

Certain information such as birth weight and smoking status are submitted using clinical codes. For some metrics only information coded in SNOMED is included in this publication which will result in an undercount of the true figure. We have been working on the process of mapping information submitted in other classifications such as Read, OPCS or ICD10 into SNOMED and will revise any affected data once this has been completed.

Statistics on Continuity of Carer have been published to provide data submitters and users with insight into the quality and completeness of their data. The ability to capture Continuity of Carer information was introduced as part of the move to the new data set and therefore data quality and coverage is variable between organisations, as systems and processes are developed to capture this information. Due to variations in data quality and completeness, these statistics may not accurately reflect the true number of women placed on a Continuity of Carer pathway at this early stage of development.

Statistics on the Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle version 2 have been published to provide data submitters and users with insight into the quality and completeness of their data. Due to variations in data quality and completeness, these statistics may not be an accurate reflection of trusts' performance at this early stage of development. A numerator and denominator are shown for all providers.


Known Issues

Site of booking contains a high proportion of GP practice codes in addition to hospital site codes. This is because the initial antenatal booking often takes place in non-hospital settings, such as the patient's home or GP practice.


Purpose of this page

This page aims to provide users with an evidence-based assessment of the quality of the statistical output of the Maternity Services Monthly Statistics publication by reporting against those of the nine European Statistical System (ESS) quality dimensions and principles appropriate to this output.

In doing so, this meets our obligation to comply with the UK Statistics Authority (UKSA) Code of Practice for Official Statistics, particularly Principle Q3, which states:

“Producers of statistics and data should explain clearly how they assure themselves that statistics and data are accurate, reliable, coherent and timely”.

For each dimension this page describes how this applies to the publication and references any measures in the accompanying monthly data quality measures report that are relevant for assessing the quality of the output.

These statistics are classified as experimental and should be used with caution. Experimental statistics are new official statistics undergoing evaluation.

They are published in order to involve users and stakeholders in their development and as a means to build in quality at an early stage. More information about experimental statistics can be found on the UK Statistics Authority website.


Assessment of statistics against quality dimensions and principles

The degree to which the statistical product meets user needs in both coverage and content.

This publication comprises a set of reports which have been produced from NHS-funded maternity service providers’ monthly MSDS submissions. It provides the timeliest information from the MSDS.

The MSDS does not cover non-NHS funded maternity services provided by independent organisations (e.g. private clinics).

The MSDS has been developed to help achieve better outcomes of care for mothers, babies and children. Monthly outputs from the MSDS include:

  • An HTML executive summary
  • Two CSV files, CSV Data and Measures, containing the aggregate underlying data for final month data, and two for provisional month data.
  • A CSV Data Quality file showing national and provider-level data quality measures for final month data, and one for provisional month data.
  • A detailed Metadata file describing all of the measures in the analysis. This includes, for each measure, how it has been constructed from providers’ submissions and how and where it is used.
Feedback

The statistics in this publication series are presently marked as ‘experimental’ and may be subject to further change as we develop our statistics. We welcome feedback on these statistics.


Accuracy and reliability

Accuracy is the proximity between an estimate and the unknown true value.

Reliability is the closeness of early estimates to subsequent estimated values.

Accuracy

The MSDS is a rich, person level data set that records packages of care received by individuals in contact with NHS-funded maternity services. NHS England provides a number of different reports at different stages in the data flow to ensure that the submitted data reflects the services that have been provided:

For data suppliers only:

At the point of submission:

  • Providers receive immediate feedback on the quality of their submission through a validation file. This file includes record-level reports of any submission errors, giving the data providers detailed information about which records produced which errors.

On receipt of processed data by NHS England:

  • A variety of data quality checks are run as part of the validation and load process for monthly data, prior to production of this monthly release. Where there are concerns about data quality we contact providers directly so that any issues with local data extraction processes can be addressed for a future submission.

For all users:

As part of this publication, we publish a CSV file of data quality of submissions from maternity service providers.

Users of the data must make their own assessment of the quality of the data for a particular purpose, drawing on these resources.

In addition, local knowledge, or other comparative data sources, may be required to distinguish changes in volume between reporting periods that reflect changes in service delivery from those that are an artefact of changes in data quality.

The analysis in this report is based on the latest data submitted by providers during the two month window to provide data. Any data which are re-submitted by a provider during the submission window will be used in place of an earlier submission within the window. We invite and welcome feedback from users on our constructions.

Reliability

Coverage – are all eligible providers submitting data?

All providers of NHS-funded maternity services should submit MSDS data. However, at present not all providers are making full submissions. 

All trusts made a submission, however some trusts submitted a limited number of tables. Detailed information on submission completeness can be found in the accompanying data quality file.

This publication reports on activity that was submitted for the June 2023 reporting period.  As a revised national level data set there have been a number of issues in terms of non-response from providers which in turn has an impact on the geographical coverage expected of the data set, hence some caution should be taken when interpreting the data at levels higher than individual provider level.

Because of this, no figures derived from the MSDS data have been presented as England total figures, rather they are presented in terms of all providers who submitted data to the MSDS for the reporting period in question. While the number of submitting providers is all we expect, the number of providers submitting valid data for each data table and data item varies widely. Totals therefore continue to be presented as 'all submitters' values, and users of the data should consider the coverage for the relevant analysis when interpreting the data.

Coverage – is data for all eligible people included in the submission?

Local knowledge may be required to assess the completeness of a submission, based on information about local caseload. This publication provides detailed information about activity and providers and commissioners are encouraged to review this to ensure that submissions accurately reflect the local situation. Providers should also use all the aggregate record counts produced at the point of submission as part of the Data Summary Reports to check coverage in key areas (e.g. number of booking appointments.)

Where an organisation is submitting delivery data to MSDS, the number of deliveries reported in a month can be compared to the 2021-22 monthly average number of deliveries in HES to review the levels of activity reported in the MSDS for each organisation (noting that MSDS is not limited to births in hospital). Where an organisation has not submitted delivery data to MSDS, a similar comparison can be made using the number of booking appointments in the month, bearing in mind that not all booking appointments will lead to a birth for that pregnancy within a reporting organisation. 

Duplication

Validations are in place to ensure that there is only one booking appointment for each woman submitted to NHS England per organisation for the particular reporting period. It is possible that one woman may have multiple booking appointments recorded for the same pregnancy for different providers. For any calculated total value presented in this report a woman is only counted once in relation to the activity related to the booking appointment. For example, if a woman is reported for a booking appointment by two separate organisations within the same NHS England Region then they would be counted in any total for each of these providers presented at the provider level but would only be counted once for the overall NHS England Region. However, if the woman was reported by two separate providers within two separate NHS England Regions then they would be counted in the overall total calculated for each NHS England Region.

If a woman is reported for a booking appointment by two separate organisations within the same NHS England Region and different data are submitted by each provider then this woman may be counted twice for the overall NHS England Region total. For example, where a woman has an age recorded as 39 by one provider and 40 by another provider this woman would be counted in the NHS England Region total twice, once in the '35 to 39' age group and once in the '40 to 44' age group.

Similarly, a baby reported by two separate organisations within the same NHS England Region with an Apgar score at 5 minutes of 6 recorded by one provider and 8 by another provider would be counted in the NHS England Region total twice, once in the '0 to 6' group and once in the '7 to 10' group.

Timeliness of recording events on local systems

Whilst local systems may be continuously updated, the MSDS submission process provides a time-limited opportunity for data relevant to each month to be submitted. The submission window opens the day after the reporting month and remains open for two months. This means that the timeliness of recording all relevant activity on local systems has an impact on the completeness of the MSDS submission. For example, a booking appointment made in April 2023, but not entered onto the local system until July 2023, will not have been included in the April 2023 submission (deadline end of June 2023). Providers should use the data summary reports produced at the point of submission to ensure that all relevant data has been included.

In May 2023 we moved from processing data submissions at only one point at the end of the two-month reporting window, to processing the data submissions at two points: mid-way through and at the end of the two-month reporting window. This means that submissions made in the first month of the reporting window will now be processed as the provisional submission of the respective reporting period and will produce provisional statistics. We will continue to run final processing on submissions at the end of the second month for final national analysis and reporting purposes. For example, a booking appointment made in April 2023 and included in the MSDS submission of April activity before the end of May 2023 will be included in the provisional April 2023 published figures, but if it was not included in the MSDS submission of April activity until sometime during June 2023 then it would only be included in the later final April 2023 published figures.

The submission requirements for MSDS are that all appropriate activity (e.g. booking appointment, dating scans, etc.) be included in the submission for each month in which they start, continue or end. It is important that data providers ensure that NHS numbers are submitted consistently because this is a key piece of information for creating the person identifiers in our records.

Quality of experimental analysis

It should be noted that these statistics are presently experimental in nature and are likely to be subject to further refinement; reference should be made to all accompanying footnotes and commentary when using these statistics.


Timeliness and punctuality

Timeliness refers to the time gap between publication and the reference period. Punctuality refers to the gap between planned and actual publication dates.

The monthly publication is based on the most recent available final data. For this publication, the Maternity Services Monthly Statistics report is published within four weeks of the submission window closing.

The Maternity Services Monthly Statistics report for June 2023 data was released on the pre-announced publication date and is therefore deemed to be punctual.


Coherence and comparability

Coherence is the degree to which data that are derived from different sources or methods, but refer to the same topic, are similar. Comparability is the degree to which data can be compared over time and domain.

Coherence

There is no other monthly publication that includes the same measures as are included in this publication. 

As well as this monthly report on maternity services, NHS England also publish the annual NHS Maternity Statistics report. This annual publication uses Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data submitted to NHS England and has been published annually since 2001-02. The latest report also includes 2021-22 annual data from the MSDS.

MSDS deliveries comparison with annual HES statistics
 
Organisation Code Organisation Name MSDS deliveries, Jun 2023 HES deliveries average per month 21-22 MSDS as a proportion of HES (%)
RCF AIREDALE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 140 155 90
RTK ASHFORD AND ST PETER'S HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 240 275 87
RF4 BARKING, HAVERING AND REDBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 580 600 97
RFF BARNSLEY HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 180 230 78
R1H BARTS HEALTH NHS TRUST 1030 1210 85
RC9 BEDFORDSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 550 680 81
RQ3 BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 635 580 109
RXL BLACKPOOL TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 235 215 109
RMC BOLTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 440 480 92
RAE BRADFORD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 440 395 111
RXQ BUCKINGHAMSHIRE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 325 385 84
RWY CALDERDALE AND HUDDERSFIELD NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 325 375 87
RGT CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 425 455 93
RQM CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 700 1040 67
RFS CHESTERFIELD ROYAL HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 230 230 100
RJR COUNTESS OF CHESTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 145 195 74
RXP COUNTY DURHAM AND DARLINGTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 360 365 99
RJ6 CROYDON HEALTH SERVICES NHS TRUST 280 250 112
RN7 DARTFORD AND GRAVESHAM NHS TRUST 370 395 94
RP5 DONCASTER AND BASSETLAW TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 365 360 101
RBD DORSET COUNTY HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 115 120 96
RWH EAST AND NORTH HERTFORDSHIRE NHS TRUST 400 435 92
RJN EAST CHESHIRE NHS TRUST 20 0  
RVV EAST KENT HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 455 515 88
RXR EAST LANCASHIRE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 475 490 97
RDE EAST SUFFOLK AND NORTH ESSEX NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 520 565 92
RXC EAST SUSSEX HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 210 230 91
RVR EPSOM AND ST HELIER UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 275 320 86
RDU FRIMLEY HEALTH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 735 760 97
RR7 GATESHEAD HEALTH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 205 150 137
RLT GEORGE ELIOT HOSPITAL NHS TRUST 180 170 106
RTE GLOUCESTERSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 370 475 78
RN3 GREAT WESTERN HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 305 310 98
RJ1 GUY'S AND ST THOMAS' NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 500 530 94
RN5 HAMPSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 410 415 99
RCD HARROGATE AND DISTRICT NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 140 145 97
RQX HOMERTON HEALTHCARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 465 465 100
RWA HULL UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 385 405 95
RYJ IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 785 755 104
R1F ISLE OF WIGHT NHS TRUST 95 80 119
RGP JAMES PAGET UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 135 145 93
RNQ KETTERING GENERAL HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 245 270 91
RJZ KING'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 620 655 95
RAX KINGSTON HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 305 400 76
RXN LANCASHIRE TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 385 345 112
RR8 LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 680 700 97
RJ2 LEWISHAM AND GREENWICH NHS TRUST 530 625 85
REP LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 540 620 87
R1K LONDON NORTH WEST UNIVERSITY HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 280 330 85
RWF MAIDSTONE AND TUNBRIDGE WELLS NHS TRUST 475 475 100
R0A MANCHESTER UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 1250 1530 82
RPA MEDWAY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 380 375 101
RAJ MID AND SOUTH ESSEX NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 960 1000 96
RBT MID CHESHIRE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 260 255 102
RXF MID YORKSHIRE TEACHING NHS TRUST 435 475 92
RD8 MILTON KEYNES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 310 300 103
RM1 NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 380 415 92
RVJ NORTH BRISTOL NHS TRUST 450 460 98
RNN NORTH CUMBRIA INTEGRATED CARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 200 220 91
RAP NORTH MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL NHS TRUST 245 330 74
RVW NORTH TEES AND HARTLEPOOL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 235 210 112
RGN NORTH WEST ANGLIA NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 400 515 78
RNS NORTHAMPTON GENERAL HOSPITAL NHS TRUST 320 340 94
RM3 NORTHERN CARE ALLIANCE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 370 205 180
RJL NORTHERN LINCOLNSHIRE AND GOOLE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 285 305 93
RTF NORTHUMBRIA HEALTHCARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 260 260 100
RX1 NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 625 660 95
RTH OXFORD UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 585 625 94
RHU PORTSMOUTH HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE TRUST 455 415 110
RHW ROYAL BERKSHIRE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 380 385 99
REF ROYAL CORNWALL HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 325 335 97
RH8 ROYAL DEVON UNIVERSITY HEALTHCARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 345 435 79
RAL ROYAL FREE LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 620 660 94
RA2 ROYAL SURREY COUNTY HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 260 240 108
RD1 ROYAL UNITED HOSPITALS BATH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 330 365 90
RNZ SALISBURY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 160 175 91
RXK SANDWELL AND WEST BIRMINGHAM HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 385 415 93
RHQ SHEFFIELD TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 460 490 94
RK5 SHERWOOD FOREST HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 300 280 107
RH5 SOMERSET NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 345 350 99
RTR SOUTH TEES HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 330 385 86
R0B SOUTH TYNESIDE AND SUNDERLAND NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 280 305 92
RJC SOUTH WARWICKSHIRE UNIVERSITY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 250 260 96
RVY SOUTHPORT AND ORMSKIRK HOSPITAL NHS TRUST 160 190 84
RJ7 ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 345 380 91
RBN ST HELENS AND KNOWSLEY TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 315 325 97
RWJ STOCKPORT NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 210 275 76
RTP SURREY AND SUSSEX HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 350 440 80
RMP TAMESIDE AND GLOSSOP INTEGRATED CARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 160 180 89
RNA THE DUDLEY GROUP NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 325 335 97
RAS THE HILLINGDON HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 330 330 100
RTD THE NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 545 495 110
RQW THE PRINCESS ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL NHS TRUST 270 315 86
RCX THE QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL, KING'S LYNN, NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 150 165 91
RFR THE ROTHERHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 215 205 105
RL4 THE ROYAL WOLVERHAMPTON NHS TRUST 490 410 120
RXW THE SHREWSBURY AND TELFORD HOSPITAL NHS TRUST 320 325 98
RA9 TORBAY AND SOUTH DEVON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 150 165 91
RWD UNITED LINCOLNSHIRE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 350 370 95
RRV UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 425 425 100
RHM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 485 435 111
RRK UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 895 700 128
RA7 UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BRISTOL AND WESTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 325 405 80
RKB UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS COVENTRY AND WARWICKSHIRE NHS TRUST 435 455 96
R0D UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS DORSET NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 320 340 94
RTG UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF DERBY AND BURTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 575 730 79
RWE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST 805 775 104
RTX UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF MORECAMBE BAY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 225 225 100
RJE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF NORTH MIDLANDS NHS TRUST 450 500 90
RK9 UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS PLYMOUTH NHS TRUST 220 310 71
RYR UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS SUSSEX NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 615 780 79
RBK WALSALL HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST 375 305 123
RWW WARRINGTON AND HALTON TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 205 215 95
RWG WEST HERTFORDSHIRE TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 325 340 96
RGR WEST SUFFOLK NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 180 180 100
RKE WHITTINGTON HEALTH NHS TRUST 210 290 72
RBL WIRRAL UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 235 245 96
RWP WORCESTERSHIRE ACUTE HOSPITALS NHS TRUST 395 400 99
RRF WRIGHTINGTON, WIGAN AND LEIGH NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 175 170 103
RLQ WYE VALLEY NHS TRUST 135 140 96
RCB YORK AND SCARBOROUGH TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST 300 360 83
Breastfeeding at 6 to 8 weeks after birth

From the publication of March 2022 data, we introduced a new measure to this publication which counts the percentage of babies aged 9 weeks old who were fully or partially breastfed between 6 - 8 weeks old. This new Clinical Quality Improvement Metric (CQIM) uses both the Maternity Services Dataset (MSDS) and Community Services Dataset (CSDS). The data for this new CQIMBreastfeeding6to8weeks metric can be found in the Measures file available for download, and information on the construction of this measure can be found in the accompanying Metadata file. Due to variations in data quality and completeness these statistics may not accurately reflect the true number of babies breastfeeding between 6 and 8 weeks old, at this early stage of measure development.

The official statistics for breastfeeding prevalence at 6 to 8 weeks after birth are produced quarterly and annually by the Office of Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID). This aggregate data is collected through an interim reporting system set up to collect health visiting activity data at a local authority level and is submitted by local authorities on a voluntary basis. While coverage is generally good, the data quality has not reached the desired level to remove the experimental statistics status.

This new CQIMBreastfeeding6to8weeks data published by NHS England is an experimental use of record level data from the (CSDS) and the (MSDS) to begin to produce a comparable and more powerful statistic to that currently published by OHID. Record level data supports reporting on inequalities such as deprivation and ethnicity. The longer-term strategic solution for data collection and reporting for these metrics is the Community Services Dataset (CSDS) which will eventually replace the statistics currently published by OHID. While the CSDS is operational and reporting is underway, providers remain at different stages of maturity with their submissions and additional time is needed for this dataset to reach sufficient coverage. For this reason, it has been agreed that OHID’s interim reporting arrangements will continue for now.

NHS England previously produced a data collection on mothers initiating breastfeeding by NHS Trust and by CCG, which went up to March 2017. Over this same time period, the MSDS only reported the baby's first feed, which differed from the definition of initiation in the NHS England collection, so data is not exactly comparable between the two sources.

Smoking at time of delivery

Official statistics on Smoking at Time of Delivery (SATOD) are published by NHS England on a quarterly basis using aggregate returns from CCGs. The analysis of smoking at delivery recorded in the MSDS published for January 2017 includes a comparison with data from the SATOD collection for October – December 2016 to explore the quality of MSDS submissions.

Births in England and Wales: Office for National Statistics

The Office for National Statistics also publishes annual data on live births and stillbirths in England and Wales. These data are collated from local registrar records and are the most complete data source available. The latest publication for these data can be found here.


Accessibility and clarity

Accessibility is the ease with which users are able to access the data, also reflecting the format in which the data are available and the availability of supporting information. Clarity refers to the quality and sufficiency of the metadata, illustrations and accompanying advice.

Accessibility

Alongside this background quality document, an executive summary is made freely accessible via the NHS Digital website as an HTML page together with a supporting monthly data file in machine-readable format (with an accompanying metadata document).

Re-use of our data is subject to conditions outlined here: https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions

Data Services for Commissioners Regional Offices (DSCROs) can obtain a record level extract of data relevant to the Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) that they support and can share data with these CCGs subject to the relevant data sharing agreements being in place. Information about DSCROs is available from https://digital.nhs.uk/services/data-services-for-commissioners-dsfc

Clarity

For each provisional and final month's data published, two monthly data files are presented as a CSV file with an accompanying data quality CSV file. There is also an accompanying metadata file in MS Excel format. A broad definition of each measure, including the data items used in the analysis and constructions, are contained within the metadata file. Terminology is defined where appropriate.

Full details of the way that MSDS returns are processed, which will be of use to analysts and other users of these data, are provided in the MSDS User Guidance, available on the NHS Digital website: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-collections-and-data-sets/data-sets/maternity-services-data-set

In order to prevent disclosure of identities or information about service users, all figures for all organisations which submitted are rounded according to the suppression methodology guidance for this dataset, as follows: counts of zero are shown as zero, counts of 1-7 are rounded to 5, and all other counts are rounded to the nearest 5, with rates (where relevant) calculated from the rounded numerator and denominator numbers. There are four exceptions to this, for rare events, where rates are calculated from unrounded numbers but are not shown where the numerator is less than 8. This applies to CQIMTears, CQIMPPH, CQIMPreterm, and CQIMApgar.


Trade-offs between output quality components

This refers to the extent to which different aspects of quality are balanced against each other

The format of this publication meets user needs for a greater wealth of information on maternity services in England. Benefits to users include the publication of detailed data on a monthly basis together with associated data quality measures, as well as a visual representation of the national picture on a monthly basis.

The aggregate underlying data provides a much greater scope of analysis and will support a variety of local uses as well as meeting our obligations under the Code of Practice for Statistics and the Transparency Agenda.

The format of this publication balances the need for increased frequency of reporting and scope of analysis with NHS England resources and production time. NHS England is publishing the data in an HTML format, whilst supporting the Open Data initiative by also publishing data in a machine-readable format. By publishing a range of clearly defined measures in a timely fashion we hope to support discussions between providers and commissioners about caseload and activity and promote a virtuous cycle of improving data quality, through use.

For MSDS version 2.0 analysis, we stopped producing the basic suite of data tables as part of this publication. However, the machine-readable data files are very detailed and allow data users to easily produce custom tabulations as required for their own analytical purposes.


Assessment of user needs and perceptions

This refers to the processes for finding out about users and uses, and their views on the statistical products.

The purpose of the MSDS monthly reports is to provide maternity service providers, commissioners and other stakeholders with timely information about activity. This is intended to support changes in commissioning arrangements as services move from block commissioning to commissioning based on activity and outcomes for mothers and babies.

For members of the public, researchers and other stakeholders, the release provides up to date information about the people in contact with services.

NHS Digital, prior to the merger with NHS England, held a number of workshops for maternity service providers and system suppliers, providing updates on the development of the data set and allowing clinicians, system administrators and informatics staff to provide feedback during the development stage. NHS England continues to hold workshops with service providers and system suppliers, providing relevant updates on data quality and future development of the data set, and obtaining feedback on use of the data. 

NHS Digital, prior to the merger with NHS England, also held workshops with analysts who use MSDS data and other maternity data to seek feedback to inform further development of the monthly reports and other outputs and encourage wider use of MSDS data.


Balance between performance, cost, and respondent burden

This refers to the effectiveness, efficiency and economy of the statistical output.

As a 'secondary uses' data set, the MSDS does not require the collection of new data items by maternity providers. It re-uses existing clinical and operational data for purposes other than direct patient care.

Providers are not required to submit data held only on paper records as no provision has been made in the MSDS for the cost of transcribing these records to an electronic format.

Only three of the data tables are required to flow in every MSDS submission (MSD001, MSD002 and MSD101); completion of the remaining tables is only necessary when activity has occurred that is captured within these tables.


Confidentiality, transparency and security

This refers to the procedures and policy used to ensure sound confidentiality, security and transparent practices.

All publications are subject to a standard NHS Digital risk assessment prior to issue. Disclosure control is implemented where deemed necessary.

Please see links below to relevant NHS Digital policies, these will be replaced with new combined NHS England policies in time:


Administrative Sources

Maternity Services Data Set (MSDS): this is a patient-level data set that captures information about activity carried out by Maternity Services relating to a mother and baby(s), from the point of the first booking appointment until mother and baby(s) are discharged from maternity services. This is a secondary uses data set, which re-uses clinical and operational data for purposes other than direct patient care.



Last edited: 21 September 2023 9:31 am