Skip to main content

Publication, Part of

National Audit of Pulmonary Hypertension, 13th Annual Report

Audit, Open data

Future publication format

Please note that future reports will be web-based only. This is to improve the accessibility of our publications.

19 January 2023 09:30 AM

National Standards

Overview

Measurement of clinical practice against professional clinical standards is a key principle of clinical audit. Once comparison to standards has taken place a clinical team can then develop local action plans for any changes that have been identified as necessary in order to improve their PH service.

Targets and standards are reviewed annually by the Pulmonary Hypertension Outcomes Group (PHOG).

Standards are applicable to all specialist PH centres, although they do not provide identical services. Thresholds for standards are not set to 100% because the targets do not take every factor into account. Care may be given that is not in line with the standard without indicating it was incorrect or poor practice. Specialist PH centres should consider whether this is the case when reflecting on their results.

Meeting the standards
  • Proportions meeting each standard are rounded up or down to the nearest whole number. The standard is met if the rounded number is greater than or equal to the target value.
  • New standards may be considered depending on changes to clinical practice and guideline recommendations.

What is different this audit year?


Comparability

As in the previous NAPH report, results from previous years have been updated using:

1. the latest available information in the NAPH

All results in this report are derived from data extracted on 20 September 2022, meaning that results for earlier audit years (2016-17 to 2020-21) included in this report will sometimes differ from those published in previous reports.

Why has a new extract been used? It is important to take the latest and most accurate cut of the NAPH data. NAPH is a continuous collection and PH centres are able to add, amend and delete information about patients used in earlier cohorts.

2. the latest methodology

Methodology is constantly reviewed and revised if required. Details of methodological changes to the National Standards are in the next section below. The updated methodology has been applied to all audit years in the report.

Why have earlier years been updated with the new methodology? To maintain the internal consistency of this report, it is important that the same methodology is applied across all audit years in the 13th Annual Report publication.

3. the latest targets

Target levels are constantly reviewed and revised if required. Changes to the targets for the 13th Annual Report are outlined in the next section below, with updated targets applied to all audit years in the report.

Why have earlier years been updated with the new targets? To maintain the internal consistency of this report, it is important that the targets shown in the 13th Annual Report tables are consistent across all audit years.

Following the above changes, the figures produced for the 13th Annual Report supersede those previously published.


Updates

Updated targets:
  • PH centre targets have been reported for 2021-22. However due to the COVID-19 pandemic, they have not been assessed.
  • National Standard 12: ‘Patients receiving a PH drug should have an annual consultation’. Target raised from 90% to 95%.
Updated standards:
  • National Standard 4b: ‘New PAH/CTEPH/no diagnosis patients should be seen or discharged within 30 days’ is reported for the children’s centre only and now includes patients with no diagnosis.
  • National Standard 6b: ‘Patients should have pre-treatment WHO functional class recorded’ has been reported by PH centre level for the first time.
  • National Standard 11b: ‘Patients who have quality of life recorded should have a score recorded’ has been reported by PH centre level for the first time.
  • National Standard 14: ‘Waiting times for BPA should be <18 weeks’ has been reported by PH centre level for the first time.
  • National Standard 15: ‘PH centres should record patient participation in research ’has been reported by PH centre level for the first time.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, PH centre results have not been reported for 2020-21.


Summary by audit year

Table NSS 1: National Standards: Summary by audit year, Great Britain, 2016-22

National Standard

Target

%

Audit Year Trend (1) 
No. Description 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
% % % % % % p≤0.05
1 PH centres should participate in the Audit ♦ All 8 of 8 8 of 8 8 of 8 8 of 8 8 of 8 8 of 8 N/A
2 PH centres should see a sufficient number of patients All 8 of 8 8 of 8 8 of 8 8 of 8 N/A 8 of 8 N/A
3 New patients should be diagnosed within 6 months ♦ 95 98 98 99 99 98 96 Down ▼ 
4a New patients should be seen or discharged within 30 days 50 53 59 64 67 75 76 Static
5 Patients receiving a PH drug should have pre-treatment cardiac catheterisation ♦ 95 96 96 97 94 80 93 Up
6a Patients should have pre-treatment WHO functional class and an exercise test recorded ♦ 90 85 98 96 96 72 93 Up
6b Patients should have pre-treatment WHO functional class recorded   90 N/A N/A N/A N/A 98 98 Static
7 Patients should have a pre-treatment vasoreactivity study recorded 80 N/A N/A 59 59 57 80 Up
8 New patients should begin drug therapy within 12 weeks of referral 80 81 81 80 83 81 83 Static ▬ 
9 Patients receiving a PH drug should have had a PH diagnosis recorded 99 100 100 100 100 100 100 Static ▬ 
10 First line drug therapy for PAH should be a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor 80 92 93 91 92 91 95 Up
11a Patient quality of life should be recorded ♦ 90 89 95 96 94 76 88 Up
11b Patients who have quality of life recorded should have a score recorded 90  N/A N/A  N/A 98 82 92 Up
12 Patients receiving a PH drug should have an annual consultation ♦ $ 95 96 96 96 96 95 96 Up
13 Waiting times for pulmonary endarterectomy should be <4 months 90 13 18 11 11 23 11 Down
14 Waiting times for BPA should be <18 weeks 80  N/A  N/A N/A 67* 11 41 Up
15 PH centres should record patient participation in research 20  N/A N/A  N/A 32 32 29 Down

Targets:

Met n
Not met n
Not assessed n

Trends:

▲ = Upward p≤0.05
▬ = None
▼ = Downward
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

* = Fewer than 10 cases in the denominator.

♦ = Identified by PHA UK in 2016 as the 6 most important NAPH National Standards.

$ = Change to target/definition (see Methodology).

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Variation between audit years can occur in a ‘static’ trend. Where fewer cases are involved, a greater degree of variation is possible within a ‘static’ trend.

 


Summary by PH centre

Table NSS 2: National Standards: Summary by PH centre, Great Britain, 2021-22

National Standard Target
%
PH centre
No. Description National total Golden Jubilee Great Ormond Street Imperial College Newcastle Royal Brompton and Harefield Royal Free Royal Papworth Sheffield
% % % % % % % % %
1 PH centres should participate in the Audit ♦ All 8 of 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
2 PH centres should see a sufficient number of patients All 8 of 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
3 New patients should be diagnosed within 6 months ♦ 95 96 100 98 100 76 99 88 99 100
4a New patients should be seen or discharged within 30 days 50 76 75  N/A 73 78 74 63 74 83
4b New PAH/CTEPH patients should be seen or discharged within 30 days $ 50  N/A  N/A 65 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
5 Patients receiving a PH drug should have pre-treatment cardiac catheterization ♦ 95 93 99 N/A 100 81 91 100 96 90
6a Patients should have pre-treatment WHO functional class and an exercise test recorded ♦ 90 93 99 N/A 98 68 97 93 83 98
6b Patients should have pre-treatment WHO functional class recorded  90 98 100 N/A 100 70 100 99 100 100
7 Patients should have a pre-treatment vasoreactivity study recorded 80 80 93 N/A 95 7 94 83 75* 82
8 New patients should begin drug therapy within 12 weeks of referral 80 83 85 100* 90 83 83 80 92 82
9 Patients receiving a PH drug should have had a PH diagnosis recorded 99 100 99 N/A 100 99 100 99 100 100
10 First line drug therapy for PAH should be a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor 80 95 91 N/A 96 84 94 98 91 98
11a Patient quality of life should be recorded ♦ 90 88 79 N/A 100 99 77 86 75 93
11b Patients who have quality of life recorded should have a score recorded 90 92 100 N/A 100 100 90 98 99 83
12 Patients receiving a PH drug should have an annual consultation ♦ $ 95 96 96 94 97 100 95 92 99 97
13 Waiting times for pulmonary endarterectomy should be <4 months 90 11 0 N/A 7 10 14* 14 18 8
14 Waiting times for BPA should be <18 weeks 80 41 0* N/A 50* 100* 50* 75* 33* 29*
15 PH centres should record patient participation in research 20 29 29 N/A 51 22 29 6 49 27

Targets:

Met n
Not met n
Not assessed n

Notes:

* = Fewer than 10 cases in the denominator.

♦ = Identified by PHA UK in 2016 as the 6 most important NAPH National Standards.

$ = Change to target/definition (see Methodology).

N/A = Not applicable.


NS 1: PH centres should participate in the Audit

Overview and results

Audit standard

All specialist PH centres are expected to participate (1) in the National Audit of Pulmonary Hypertension (2).

Why is this important?

Participation in the Audit can be considered a quality measure of a hospital since it indicates a willingness to share data and change practice to improve clinical performance.

The impact of COVID-19

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, PH centres and the National Audit Project Board elected to present, but not assess, data at PH centre level.

Results

Despite the pressures caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, all 8 specialist PH centres participated in the 2021-22 Audit.

PH centres that participated in the 13th Annual Report (8 of 8)
Golden Jubilee
Great Ormond Street
Imperial College
Newcastle
Royal Brompton and Harefield
Royal Free
Royal Papworth
Sheffield

Notes:

1. PH centres will determine if they are participating. Failure to participate will remove them from all other standards. For a full list of PH centres, see: Glossary: Specialist PH centres

2. The NHS England PH service specification A11/S/a 2013-14 states that “All designated PH centres will be required to submit data to the National Pulmonary Hypertension Service” (page 12) which is assumed to be a reference to the Audit.


NS 2: PH centres should see a sufficient number of patients

Summary of results

Adult centre targets:

300 patients with PAH or CTEPH

Children’s centre targets:

300 patients

100 patients with PAH or CTEPH

Targets met:

Not assessed

Overview

Audit standard

Adult specialist PH centres (1) are expected to manage at least 300 patients per annum with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and / or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) (2,3).

The children’s specialist PH centre (1) is expected to manage at least 300 patients per annum, of whom 100 patients per annum with PAH or CTEPH (2).

Why is this important?

Evidence from other disease areas suggests that best outcomes for patients are obtained in high-volume PH centres. High-volume PH centres also enable provision of a full range of investigation modalities, specialist nursing support and involvement of a wider multi-professional team with expertise in patients with PAH or CTEPH. The recommended number of patients seen is based on European guidelines which are used by the UK specialist PH centres.

Notes:

1. Adults refers to patients under the care of adult PH centres. Children are under the care of Great Ormond Street.

2. An open referral at any point in the year will constitute 'manage' within this context. An open referral indicates patients attending a specialist PH centre who include existing patients as well as new referrals. The latest diagnosis will determine PAH or CTEPH. 

3. This standard is derived from ESC/ERS guidelines with the number of patients adjusted to the NHS England PH service specification A11/S/a 2013-14.

Results

Table NS 2: PH centres meeting National Standard 2 Great Britain, 2016-22

Adults’ PH centre Managed patients with 
(Target = 300) PAH or CTEPH
  Audit year
  2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Golden Jubilee 423 455 475 514 N/A 541
Imperial College 769 774 762 765 N/A 735
Newcastle 319 337 353 368 N/A 393
Royal Brompton and Harefield 629 648 696 752 N/A 799
Royal Free 707 750 780 836 N/A 827
Royal Papworth 856 857 848 845 N/A 896
Sheffield 1,723 1,793 1,893 2,008 N/A 2,008
Total 5,426 5,614 5,807 6,088 6,069 6,199

 

Children’s PH centre Managed patients with  Managed patients
(Target = 100 PAH / CTEPH, 300 managed) PAH or CTEPH
  Audit year Audit year
  2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Great Ormond Street 157 151 151 162 N/A 167 353 352 346 346 N/A 356

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n

Notes:

1. Definition: Adult specialist PH centres are expected to manage at least 300 patients with PAH or CTEPH in a year.

2. Definition: The children’s specialist PH centre is expected to manage at least 300 patients in a year, including 100 patients with PAH or CTEPH.


NS 3: New patients should be diagnosed within 6 months

Summary of results

Target: 95%

National: 96%

Met: Yes

Trend: Met every year

Overview

Audit standard

95% of patients whose referral letter was received over 6 months ago should have a diagnosis recorded (1).

Why is this important?

It is understandable that most people who have symptoms want to know what is causing them and find a suitable treatment as soon as possible.

Symptoms may get worse whilst waiting for a diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. Specialist PH centres need to ensure that they are seeing their new patients in a timely fashion.

Notes:

1. A referral is only created when the specialist PH centre intends to see the patient as an outpatient, day case or inpatient. A referral which is turned down by the specialist PH centre should not be recorded in the Audit.

Results

Table NS 3: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 3, Great Britain, 2016-22

PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 95%) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee 99 100 100 99 N/A 100 N/A
Great Ormond Street 95 98 98 98 N/A 98 N/A
Imperial College 100 99 100 100 N/A 100 N/A
Newcastle 97 98 97 100 N/A 76 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield 98 100 99 99 N/A 99 N/A
Royal Free 98 97 98 96 N/A 88 N/A
Royal Papworth 91 91 98 99 N/A 99 N/A
Sheffield 99 100 100 100 N/A 100 N/A
National total 98 98 99 99 98 96 Down

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: 95% of patients whose referral letter was received over 6 months ago should have a diagnosis recorded.

Key finding
  • 96% of new patients in 2021-22 were diagnosed within 6 months.

NS 4: New patients should be seen or discharged within 30 days

Summary of results

Target: 50%

National: All (4a): 76%

Met: Yes

Trend: Best performance since standards began

Overview

Audit standard

50% of patients should have attended a consultation (inpatient, day case or outpatient) or have been discharged within 30 days of receipt of their first referral (1).

Why is this important?

This standard measures how quickly patients are seen by specialist PH centres following a new referral. In some patients, the symptoms of PH may progress between referral and the first consultation in a PH centre so it is desirable that patients are seen promptly.

Notes:

1. The NHS England PH service specification A11/S/a 2013-14 states that “There will be minimal delay between referral to a designated PH centre and an outpatient consultant appointment. All patients referred urgently will be able to see a specialist within 1 month of the PH centre receiving their referral and those who are severely symptomatic will be seen within 2 weeks.” (page 4). The Audit does not distinguish elective and urgent referrals so this proportion is arbitrary.

Changes to National Standard 4
  • Patients with no diagnosis are included in National Standard 4b for the first time in the 13th Annual Report.
  • National Standard 4b now applies to the children’s centre only.

NS 4a: New patients should be seen or discharged within 30 days

Results

Table NS 4a: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 4a, Great Britain, 2016-22

Adults’ PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 50%) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee 17 41 74 71 N/A 75 N/A
Imperial College 71 63 61 79 N/A 73 N/A
Newcastle 19 38 79 84 N/A 78 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield 58 60 59 60 N/A 74 N/A
Royal Free 57 73 76 79 N/A 63 N/A
Royal Papworth 42 51 57 67 N/A 74 N/A
Sheffield 64 63 56 54 N/A 83 N/A
National total 53 59 64 67 75 76 Static

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: 50% of patients should have attended a consultation (inpatient, day case or outpatient) or have been discharged within 30 days of receipt of their first referral.

Key finding
  • 76% of new patients in 2021-22 were seen or discharged within 30 days.

NS 4b: New PAH/CTEPH/no diagnosis patients should be seen or discharged within 30 days

Results

Table NS 4b: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 4b, Great Britain, 2018-22

Children's PH centre Audit year Trend
(Target = 50%) 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % % p≤0.05
Great Ormond Street 79 59 N/A 65 N/A

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Standard 4b has been reported for the children’s centre since 2018-19. Adult PH centres were included in the national total for the first time in 2019-20 and 2020-21. This standard is now reported for the children’s centre only and includes patients with no diagnosis.

Notes:

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: 50% of PAH/CTEPH/no diagnosis patients should have attended a consultation (inpatient, day case or outpatient) or have been discharged within 30 days of receipt of their first referral.

Key finding
  • 65% of new PAH/CTEPH/no diagnosis patients in 2021-22 were seen or discharged within 30 days.

NS 5: Patients receiving a PH drug should have pre-treatment cardiac catheterisation

Summary of results

Target: 95%

National: 93%

Met: No

Trend: Not met for third consecutive year

Overview

Audit standard

95% of adult patients receiving a pulmonary hypertension drug therapy (excluding patients diagnosed as pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease (1)) should have a cardiac catheterisation recorded, either before or up to 2 weeks after treatment begins.

Why is this important?

Cardiac catheterisation (2) is considered the best method for confirming the presence, nature and severity of pulmonary hypertension.

It is reasonable to be certain about the diagnosis before starting treatment.

Notes:

1. Some PH centres do not routinely undertake cardiac catheterisation in patients with Eisenmenger’s syndrome.

2. Cardiac catheterisation is an invasive diagnostic examination of the heart. PHA UK: Cardiac catheterisation

Results

Table NS 5: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 5, Great Britain, 2016-22

Adults’ PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 95%) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee 99 99 99 91 N/A 99 N/A
Imperial College 100 97 96 97 N/A 100 N/A
Newcastle 89 98 100 95 N/A 81 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield 94 94 97 87 N/A 91 N/A
Royal Free 99 97 96 100 N/A 100 N/A
Royal Papworth 95 97 97 97 N/A 96 N/A
Sheffield 94 95 98 93 N/A 90 N/A
National total 96 96 97 94 80 93 Up

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: 95% of adult patients receiving a pulmonary hypertension drug therapy (excluding patients diagnosed as pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease) should have a cardiac catheterisation recorded before or up to 2 weeks after treatment begins.

Key finding
  • 93% of patients with first drug therapy in 2021-22 had pre-treatment cardiac catheterisation.

NS 6: Patients should have pre-treatment exercise test and WHO functional class recorded

Summary of results

Target: 90%

National: Exercise test and WHO class (6a): 93%

WHO class (6b): 98%

Met: Yes

Trend: 6a up from 2020-21

Overview

Audit question

90% of adult patients with PAH / CTEPH should have a WHO functional class (1) and exercise test (2) (6-minute walk or incremental shuttle) recorded before they begin any pulmonary hypertension drug therapy.

Why is this important?

The World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (1) is a measure of the extent of functional limitation due to pulmonary hypertension and is a prognostic factor. Patients in different WHO functional classes require different PAH drugs and combinations of these drugs.

The extent of exercise limitation due to PAH / CTEPH can be assessed quantitatively by a formal exercise test. Both WHO functional class and exercise performance may improve with treatment and by recording this information a response to treatment can be documented later.

Notes:

1. See Glossary: WHO functional class for definitions.

2. The exercise test distance should be recorded as zero if the patient is unable to perform the test for reasons of pulmonary hypertension. From 1 April 2017 the reason for not performing an exercise test can be recorded in the database.

Standard 6b is reported for the first time at PH centre level in this report.

NS 6a: Patients should have pre-treatment exercise test and WHO functional class recorded

Results

Table NS 6a: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 6a, Great Britain, 2016-22

Adults’ PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 90%) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee 94 98 100 89 N/A 99 N/A
Imperial College 97 100 92 97 N/A 98 N/A
Newcastle 87 98 94 100 N/A 68 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield 96 93 96 88 N/A 97 N/A
Royal Free 98 99 97 99 N/A 93 N/A
Royal Papworth 89 96 91 99 N/A 83 N/A
Sheffield 73 98 98 98 N/A 98 N/A
National total 85 98 96 96 72 93 Up

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: 90% of adult patients with PAH / CTEPH should have a WHO functional class and an exercise test (6-minute walk or incremental shuttle) recorded before they begin any pulmonary hypertension drug therapy.

Key finding
  • 93% of patients with first drug therapy in 2021-22 had a pre-treatment exercise test and WHO functional class recorded.

NS 6b: Patients should have pre-treatment WHO functional class recorded

Results

Table NS 6b: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 6b, Great Britain, 2020-22

Adults’ PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 90%) 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee N/A 100 N/A
Imperial College N/A 100 N/A
Newcastle N/A 70 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield N/A 100 N/A
Royal Free N/A 99 N/A
Royal Papworth N/A 100 N/A
Sheffield N/A 100 N/A
National total 98 98 Static

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: 90% of adult patients with PAH / CTEPH should have a WHO functional class recorded before they begin any pulmonary hypertension drug therapy.

Key finding
  • 98% of patients with first drug therapy in 2021-22 had a pre-treatment WHO functional class recorded.

NS 7: Patients should have a pre-treatment vasoreactivity study recorded

Summary of results

Target: 80%

National: 80%

Met: Yes

Trend: Met for the first time

Overview

Audit standard

80% of adult patients who have idiopathic, heritable or drug-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) should have undergone a vasoreactivity study before starting PAH drug therapy.

Why is this important?

The information provided by undergoing a vasoreactivity study determines whether the patient with IPAH is most likely to respond to treatment with calcium channel blockers in preference to other drug therapies including prostanoids, endothelin antagonists or PDE5 inhibitors.

Notes:

1. Definition: 80% of adult patients who have idiopathic, heritable or drug-induced PAH should have undergone a vasoreactivity study before starting PAH drug therapy.

Results

Table NS 7: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 7, Great Britain, 2018-22

Adults’ PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 80%) 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee N/A 80 N/A 93 N/A
Imperial College N/A 85 N/A 95 N/A
Newcastle N/A 29 N/A 7 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield N/A 72 N/A 94 N/A
Royal Free N/A 50 N/A 83 N/A
Royal Papworth N/A 43 N/A 75* N/A
Sheffield N/A 56 N/A 82 N/A
National total 59 59 57 80 Up

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

* = Fewer than 10 cases in the denominator.

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: 80% of adult patients who have idiopathic, heritable or drug-induced PAH should have undergone a vasoreactivity study before starting PAH drug therapy.

Key finding
  • 80% of IPAH patients with first drug therapy in 2021-22 had a pre-treatment vasoreactivity study recorded.

NS 8: New patients should begin drug therapy within 12 weeks of referral

Summary of results

Target: 80%

National: 83%

Met: Yes

Trend: Static

Overview

Audit standard

80% of new referrals who have a diagnosis of idiopathic, heritable, anorexigen-induced or connective tissue disease associated PAH and are in WHO functional class II, III or IV, should commence PAH drug therapy within 12 weeks of receipt of their first referral (1).

Why is this important?

For patients with some types of PAH it is important to start drug treatment in a timely manner to try to avoid deterioration as a result of progressive disease. This measurement of the time it takes from referral to treatment provides an overview of the timeliness of clinical processes.

Notes:

1. This standard is based on the NHS England PH service specification A11/S/1 2013-14: “All new patients will complete all investigations required to make a diagnosis and to determine a treatment plan and commence drug therapy within 12 weeks of the referral being received by the designated PH centre. Evidence shows that waiting beyond 12 weeks can compromise survival.” (page 4).

Results

Table NS 8: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 8, Great Britain, 2016-22

PH centre Audit year Trend
(Target = 80%) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee 48 57 61 80 N/A 85 N/A
Great Ormond Street 100* 100* N/A (2) 100* N/A 100* N/A
Imperial College 100 83 83 88 N/A 90 N/A
Newcastle 82 30 90 89 N/A 83 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield 80 82 86 79 N/A 83 N/A
Royal Free 82 94 89 86 N/A 80 N/A
Royal Papworth 67 93 75 85 N/A 92 N/A
Sheffield 86 86 79 83 N/A 82 N/A
National total 81 81 80 83 81 83 Static

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

* = Fewer than 10 cases in the denominator.

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: 80% of new referrals who have a diagnosis of idiopathic, heritable, anorexigen-induced or connective tissue disease associated PAH and are in WHO functional class II, III or IV, should commence PAH drug therapy within 12 weeks of receipt of their first referral.

2. No patients applicable.

Key finding
  • 83% of new IPAH or CTD patients in 2021-22 with WHO class II to IV began drug therapy within 12 weeks of referral.

NS 9: Patients receiving a PH drug should have had a PH diagnosis recorded

Summary of results

Target: 99%

National: 100%

Met: Yes

Trend: Always met

Overview

Audit standard

99% of adult patients receiving a pulmonary hypertension drug therapy should have a pulmonary hypertension diagnosis recorded.

Why is this important?

Specialist pulmonary hypertension drugs should only be prescribed for selected patients with pulmonary hypertension.

It is important to confirm that a patient, for whom a drug is prescribed, has a qualifying diagnosis.

Results

Table NS 9: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 9, Great Britain, 2016-22

Adults’ PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 99%) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee 99 99 99 99 N/A 99 N/A
Imperial College 100 99 100 100 N/A 100 N/A
Newcastle 100 98 100 100 N/A 99 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield 100 99 99 100 N/A 100 N/A
Royal Free 100 100 99 99 N/A 99 N/A
Royal Papworth 100 100 100 100 N/A 100 N/A
Sheffield 100 100 100 100 N/A 100 N/A
National total 100 100 100 100 100 100 Static

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: 99% of adult patients receiving a pulmonary hypertension drug therapy should have a pulmonary hypertension diagnosis recorded.

Key finding
  • Almost 100% of active drug therapies in 2021-22 had a PH diagnosis recorded.

NS 10: First line drug therapy for PAH should be a PDE5 inhibitor

Summary of results

Target: 80%

National: 95%

Met: Yes

Trend: Always met

Overview

Audit standard

First line drug therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension should be a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor in 80% or more of adult patients, excluding those patients whose first drug therapy was a calcium channel blocker.

Why is this important?

Pulmonary arterial hypertension can be treated with 3 different groups of medicines. The NHS England policy (1) requires that a PDE5 inhibitor (2) (sildenafil or tadalafil) is used first on economic grounds.

Nevertheless, this drug is contraindicated (3) in some patients. According to NHS England policy, the patients who manifest the most severe symptoms (in WHO functional class IV) may be recommended a prostacyclin as first line therapy instead.

Notes:

1. The NHS England Clinical Commissioning Policy A11/P/b 2014 states that “Monotherapy with an oral PDE5I will be routinely commissioned as first line therapy.” (page 12).

2. Phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitors inhibit the enzyme PDE5, leading to relaxation of the blood vessels and increased blood flow.

3. Medical advice that suggests a particular drug or treatment should not be used in some circumstances.

Results

Table NS 10: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 10, Great Britain, 2016-22

Adults’ PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 80%) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee 90 87 89 85 N/A 91 N/A
Imperial College 84 98 100 98 N/A 96 N/A
Newcastle 93 100 89 91 N/A 84 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield 91 91 84 89 N/A 94 N/A
Royal Free 100 96 94 84 N/A 98 N/A
Royal Papworth 89 85 93 88 N/A 91 N/A
Sheffield 92 93 91 95 N/A 98 N/A
National total 92 93 91 92 91 95 Up

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: First line drug therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension should be a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor in more than 80% of adult patients, excluding those patients whose first drug therapy was a calcium channel blocker.

Key finding
  • 95% of new drug therapies in 2021-22 had PDE5 inhibitors as first line drug therapy.

NS 11: Patient quality of life should be recorded

Summary of results

Target: 90%

National: QoL recorded (11a): 88%

QoL score recorded (11b): 92%

Met: No

Trend: 11a not met for second consecutive year

Overview

Audit standard

90% of adult patients who have PAH or CTEPH and who have at least 1 consultation (inpatient, day case, or outpatient) in the last year should have at least 1 quality of life (QoL) questionnaire recorded in the last year. 90% of adult patients who have a quality of life recorded should have a score recorded.

Why is this important?

Assessment of the quality of life of patients with pulmonary hypertension is best achieved by asking patients to complete a questionnaire. Changes in quality of life can then be monitored in response to treatment.

PHA UK have championed the introduction of this standard. It essential that an emPHasis-10 score is recorded every time an emPHasis-10 questionnaire (typical QoL questionnaire used for PH) is undertaken.

Standard 11b is reported for the first time at PH centre level in this report.

NS 11a: Patient quality of life should be recorded

Results

Table NS 11a: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 11a, Great Britain, 2016-22

Adults’ PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 90%) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee 94 91 94 93 N/A 79 N/A
Imperial College 79 99 95 97 N/A 100 N/A
Newcastle 85 98 100 99 N/A 99 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield 95 97 93 91 N/A 77 N/A
Royal Free 92 97 98 97 N/A 86 N/A
Royal Papworth 93 87 91 83 N/A 75 N/A
Sheffield 88 97 98 97 N/A 93 N/A
National total 89 95 96 94 76 88 Up

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: Definition: 90% of adult patients who have PAH or CTEPH and who have at least 1 consultation (inpatient, day case, or outpatient) in the last year should have at least 1 quality of life questionnaire recorded in the last year.

Key finding
  • 88% of patients that had a consultation in 2021-22 had their quality of life recorded.

NS 11b: Patients who have quality of life recorded should have a score recorded

Results

Table NS 11b: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 11b, Great Britain, 2019-22

Adults’ PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 90%) 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee N/A N/A 100 N/A
Imperial College N/A N/A 100 N/A
Newcastle N/A N/A 100 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield N/A N/A 90 N/A
Royal Free N/A N/A 98 N/A
Royal Papworth N/A N/A 99 N/A
Sheffield N/A N/A 83 N/A
National total 98 82 92 Up

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: 90% of adult patients who have a quality of life questionnaire recorded should have a score recorded.

Key finding
  • 92% of patients that had a quality of life questionnaire in 2021-22 had a quality of life score recorded.

NS 12: Patients receiving a PH drug should have an annual consultation

Summary of results

Target: 95%

National: 96%

Met: Yes

Trend: Always met

Audit standard

95% of patients receiving a pulmonary hypertension drug therapy should have had a consultation (inpatient, day case or outpatient (1)) within the last 13 months (2).

Why is this important?

Specialist PH centres provide follow-up for patients for whom they are prescribing specialist drug therapies. It is crucial that the effects of these drug therapies are monitored for adequacy of response to treatment and side effects. This monitoring should be carried out at least annually by prescribers. Note that 13 months is chosen to represent 1 year so as to allow some variation in the timing of patients who only have an annual appointment with their PH centre.

Notes:

1. As for previous annual reports, all consultation types (including non-face to face) are classed as meeting the standard.

2. This standard is based on the NHS England PH service specification A11/S/a 2013-14: “Patients treated with disease targeted therapy will have lifelong follow-up within the PH service. The PH centre will identify those patients suitable for shared care and ensure effective communication with shared care PH centres to plan patient reviews. All such patients will be reviewed at least once each year by the visiting PH specialist or at the PH centre.” (page 6).

Changes to National Standard 12
  • The target for National Standard 12 has been raised from 90% to 95%.

Results

Table NS 12: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 12, Great Britain, 2016-22

PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 95%) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee 94 92 96 97 N/A 96 N/A
Great Ormond Street 96 94 93 96 N/A 94 N/A
Imperial College 94 95 96 96 N/A 97 N/A
Newcastle 97 97 100 98 N/A 100 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield 96 96 96 95 N/A 95 N/A
Royal Free 95 97 96 91 N/A 92 N/A
Royal Papworth 97 96 97 96 N/A 99 N/A
Sheffield 97 95 96 98 N/A 97 N/A
National total 96 96 96 96 95 96 Up

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: 95% of patients receiving a pulmonary hypertension drug therapy should have had a consultation (inpatient, day case or outpatient) within the last 13 months.

Key finding
  • 96% of active drug therapies in 2021-22 had an annual consultation.

NS 13: Waiting times for PEA should be <4 months

Summary of results

Target: 90%

National: 11%

Met: No

Trend: Never met

Overview

Audit standard

90% of adult patients who undergo a pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) should have waited less than 4 months from diagnosis of CTEPH by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting at the specialist PH centre (1).

Why is this important?

PEA is an operation which is performed for the treatment of selected patients with CTEPH. This may result in marked clinical improvement for patients.

This measurement looks at the time it takes from diagnosis at a specialist PH centre to surgery at Royal Papworth, the single PEA centre in the UK.

Notes: 1. See Glossary: Waiting times for pulmonary endarterectomy: Background.

Results

Table NS 13: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 13, Great Britain, 2016-22

Adults’ PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 90%) 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee 0 9 23 11 N/A 0 N/A
Imperial College 14 6 10 0 N/A 7 N/A
Newcastle 33* 8 0* 0 N/A 10 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield 0* 10 0* 0 N/A 14* N/A
Royal Free 13 17 0 17 N/A 14 N/A
Royal Papworth 28 37 23 21 N/A 18 N/A
Sheffield 2 7 6 12 N/A 8 N/A
National total 13 18 11 11 23 11 Down

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

* = Fewer than 10 cases in the denominator.

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: 90% of adult patients who undergo a PEA should have waited less than 4 months from diagnosis of CTEPH by the MDT meeting at the pulmonary hypertension specialist PH centre.

2. See Glossary: Waiting times for pulmonary endarterectomy: Background.

Key finding
  • 11% of waiting times for PEA were less than 4 months.

NS 14: Waiting times for BPA should be <18 weeks

Summary of results

Target: 80%

National: 41%

Met: No

Trend: Never met

Overview

Audit standard

80% of adult patients with CTEPH who are to be treated by balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) should undergo their first BPA procedure within 18 weeks of the BPA multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting decision to perform BPA.

Why is this important?

This measurement looks at the time it takes from decision to treat by the MDT to surgery at Royal Papworth, the single BPA centre in the UK. BPA may result in marked clinical improvement for patients who are not eligible for surgery or who have recurrent or persistent pulmonary hypertension following pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) (1).

The procedure involves inserting a very fine wire into blood vessels in the lungs, guiding a tiny balloon into position. The balloon is inflated, to around the size of a pea, for a few seconds to push the blockage aside and restore blood flow to the lung tissue. The balloon is then deflated and removed. This is usually repeated on several separate visits.

Notes:

1. Lang I and others. ‘Balloon pulmonary angioplasty in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension’ European Respiratory Review 2017; 26: 160119.

2. Adapted from Royal Papworth Hospital: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) service.

Standard 14 is reported for the first time at PH centre level in this report.

Results

Table NS 14: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 14, Great Britain, 2019-22

PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 80%) 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % %   p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee N/A N/A 0* N/A
Imperial College N/A N/A 50* N/A
Newcastle N/A N/A 100* N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield N/A N/A 50* N/A
Royal Free N/A N/A 75* N/A
Royal Papworth N/A N/A 33* N/A
Sheffield N/A N/A 29* N/A
National total 67* 11 41 Up

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

* = Fewer than 10 cases in the denominator.

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: PH centres should ensure that 80% of patients with CTEPH who are to be treated by BPA should undergo their first BPA procedure within 18 weeks of the BPA MDT meeting decision to perform BPA.

Key findings
  • 41% of CTEPH patients underwent their first BPA within 18 weeks of MDT meeting decision to perform BPA.
  • 24 BPA procedures undertaken in 2021-22.

NS 15: PH centres should record patient participation in research

Summary of results

Target: 20%

National: 29%

Met: Yes

Trend: Always met

Overview

Audit standard

PH centres should ensure that 20% of patients are given the opportunity to participate in research related to pulmonary hypertension, including biobank submissions, randomised clinical trials (including interventions) and prospective studies.

Why is this important?

Research is key to improving our understanding of PH, developing new therapies and identifying priorities for people affected by PH.

Biobanks collect biological samples, genetic data, and clinical data for use by PH researchers.

Randomised clinical (or controlled) trials divide participants into separate groups to test a specific intervention. This might include choice of drug, type of intervention or treatment approach. For trials involving new drug treatments only 1 of the groups has the treatment being tested. The other group (the comparison or control group) receives dummy (placebo) treatment. This is usually given in addition to treatments the patient is already on. Using a randomised control group reduces the chance of bias in the research by providing a neutral comparison.

Prospective studies recruit participants to assess the impact of treatments over a long period of time, typically months or years.

Standard 15 is reported for the first time at PH centre level in this report.

Results

Table NS 15: Proportion of cases meeting National Standard 15, Great Britain, 2019-22

PH centre Audit year Trend    
(Target = 20%) 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 20-21 to 21-22
  % % % p≤0.05
Golden Jubilee N/A N/A 29 N/A
Imperial College N/A N/A 51 N/A
Newcastle N/A N/A 22 N/A
Royal Brompton and Harefield N/A N/A 29 N/A
Royal Free N/A N/A 6 N/A
Royal Papworth N/A N/A 49 N/A
Sheffield N/A N/A 27 N/A
National total 32 32 29 Down

Key:

Target met n
Target not met n
Target not assessed n
▲ = Upwards trend p≤0.05
▬ = No difference
▼ = Downward trend
p≤0.05 See Glossary

Notes:

N/A = Not applicable.

1. Definition: PH centres should ensure that 20% of patients participate in research related to pulmonary hypertension, including biobank submissions, randomised clinical trial (including interventions) and prospective studies.

Key finding
  • 29% of active patients in 2021-22 participated in research.


Last edited: 19 January 2023 9:31 am